Hi Mary,
> There will be the regular meetup of women before the SLUG meeting this
> month: feel free to forward this message to any women you think might be
> interested in coming.
Added to the SLUG website. http://slug.org.au/node/76
Cheers,
Pia
--
Linux Australia
I am planning to upgrade from UBUNTU 6.6 directly to 7.4
I understand this must be done as a "new" install rather than an update.
I do not want to lose my emails on Evolution 2.6.1.
What is the best way to back up / restore them for this exercise?
Once before (FC5 to Ubuntu 6.6), I tried to do th
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:30:53 +1000
Chris Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am planning to upgrade from UBUNTU 6.6 directly to 7.4
> I understand this must be done as a "new" install rather than an update.
>
> I do not want to lose my emails on Evolution 2.6.1.
> What is the best way to back up
Hello,
I kept hearing that Samba 3 can join and do anything as a Windows
Domain Controller even better than Windows itself.
But now that I need it to replace a Backup Domain Controller (fka
Secondary Domain Controller?) to a Windows 2003 Active Directory
server I keep bumping into the following
Amos Shapira wrote:
And I'm not sure how relevant this is for my situation - is Windows
2003 considered "NT4 PDC" or is it something newer that Samba can
cooperate with as a BDC?
yeah win2k3 is considered to be an nt4 pdc in this case.
so you are fresh out of luck with samba 3. you might have a
On 6/26/07, Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I kept hearing that Samba 3 can join and do anything as a Windows
Domain Controller even better than Windows itself.
But now that I need it to replace a Backup Domain Controller (fka
Secondary Domain Controller?) to a Windows 2003 Activ
On 26/06/07, DaZZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You need to get your terminology straight first.
I suspected so :). Windows networking is so foreign to me.
There's no such thing as a "PDC" or "BDC" in an Active Directory
environment - especially a 2003 AD environment.
There are PDC and BDC _e
You can always load windows 2003 into a virtual machine on a linux host.
Its kind of scary but possible.
Dean
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:56:02 +1000, "Amos Shapira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 26/06/07, DaZZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You need to get your terminology straight first.
>
> I
