Re: [SLUG] please unsubscribe all wildtecnology.net / wildit.com.au email addresses from SLUG lists

Haha! You suck balls. On 17/07/2007, at 3:25 PM, Timothy Bolot wrote: Please remove all wildtechnology.net / wildit.com.au email addresses from your lists. Both of these domains are going to my personal hotmail account now and a previous staff member subscribed to your lists. If this is not

[SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

"Aussie film archives launch … and then crash" - ZDnet mentions how a 2.5years project implementing a home-built content management system based on Janga melted on the first morning it went public. They bother to mention that the servers run Linux. Netcraft doesn't have this web site on its data

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

seems to be pretty clear the that problem was overloading the servers quote "We’re organising additional hardware now," he said. /quote the site seems fine for me now. if they are delivering video via aarnet, they will be punishing the hardware. (we really punish mirror.aarnet at uni, download

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

Amos Shapira wrote: "Aussie film archives launch … and then crash" - ZDnet mentions how a 2.5years project implementing a home-built content management system based on Janga melted on the first morning it went public. They bother to mention that the servers run Linux. Netcraft doesn't have this

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

well im looking at the sight now and its running really well im not sure why it cost so much or took so much time, but i had no dramas watching the clips from 'kenny' - very enjoyable. *shrug* seems like a reasonable sight if you want to know a little bit about Australian films. Dean Howa

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 09:29 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote: > "Aussie film archives launch … and then crash" - ZDnet mentions how a > 2.5years project implementing a home-built content management system > based on > Janga melted on the first morning it went public. > > They bother to mention that the s

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

http://australianscreen.com.au/help/ some may be happy to note that in the FAQ w3c standards compliance is mentioned, ie, safari and ff are listed as should work perfectly. lynx even gets a mention quicktime, miro and vlc are mentioned as possible media players so there is a win for standard

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

Dean Hamstead wrote: http://australianscreen.com.au/help/ some may be happy to note that in the FAQ w3c standards compliance is mentioned, ie, safari and ff are listed as should work perfectly. lynx even gets a mention quicktime, miro and vlc are mentioned as possible media players so there

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

people love flash based video, youtube is like crack Dean Marghanita da Cruz wrote: Dean Hamstead wrote: http://australianscreen.com.au/help/ some may be happy to note that in the FAQ w3c standards compliance is mentioned, ie, safari and ff are listed as should work perfectly. lynx even get

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

Dean Hamstead wrote: people love flash based video, youtube is like crack and elsewhere in Before contacting us, it would be useful to check if you can access video on other sites, particularly sites like YouTube and Google Video, which use similar vid

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:40:34AM +1000, Marghanita da Cruz wrote: > Dean Hamstead wrote: > >http://australianscreen.com.au/help/ > > > >some may be happy to note that in the FAQ w3c standards compliance is > >mentioned, ie, safari and ff are listed as should work perfectly. lynx > >even gets a

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

Amos Shapira wrote: http://tinyurl.com/2n8tfd 'Thomas Ashelford, Australian Screen’s technical director told ZDNet Australia that its Linux servers "went into meltdown".' Of course one never seems to see the following: 'This latest virus/worm attack installs a key logger and result in you

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

Marghanita da Cruz wrote: that is poor marketing indeed, what they should have said was... > "It looks like we've had some enormous cyber-bomb set off on our > site," Mr Preston said. > > "Somebody has nuked us in some way, shape or form, and they've > obliterated almost every object on th

Re: [SLUG] Not good publicity for Linux, is it?

On 19/07/07, Rick Welykochy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Of course one never seems to see the following: 'This latest virus/worm attack installs a key logger and result in your bank details being stolen. The virus only affects Windows.' since they'd probably get sued in Australia for saying it