Re: [SLUG] expect - more modern tool available?

2007-09-29 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:25:43PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: So for example you could use clusterssh or distributed ssh; dsh or cssh packages in Debian, for example, which are quite sweet for doing the same interactive thing on a bunch of machines (with the caveat that if your machines

Re: [SLUG] expect - more modern tool available?

2007-09-29 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 03:42:54PM +1000, Matthew Hannigan wrote: http://code.google.com/p/exscript/ Exscript is a scripting language for automating network connections over protocols such as Telnet or SSH. It is in some ways comparable to Expect, but has some unique

Re: [SLUG] Looking for expertise/guidance on Linux/satellites/small form boards

2007-09-29 Thread Peter Chubb
Howard == Howard Lowndes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Howard I have experience on the 2.4GHz side with this sort of set up, Howard but nothing dealing with birds, especially WRT the hardware Howard that is suitable to drive sat. uplinks and downlinks and the Howard power requirements. Howard If

Re: [LINK] Re: [SLUG] Looking for expertise/guidance on Linux/satellites/small form boards

2007-09-29 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007, Howard Lowndes wrote: Thanks Peter, there is some good meat there esp about the TCP tuning. I am aware of the latency involved with geostat sats, but for data transfer that would not be a major issue, whereas it would be a significant issue if voice were to be