Re: [SLUG] snmp 1, 2,3

snmpv2 doesnt offer much in the way of security features over snmp 1. snmpv2 is pretty much better in all ways over snmp1, snmpv3 is snmpv2 with better security. given a read only, private LAN, just go snmpv2. Dean Voytek Eymont wrote: I want to setup snmp / rrd to chart Linksys WAG54G, loo

[SLUG] snmp 1, 2,3

I want to setup snmp / rrd to chart Linksys WAG54G, looking at WAG54G and Cacti, they both support snmp 1, 2 and 3 both Cacti and WAG54G seems to work OK on snmp 1 this is on a private LAN, security is not an issue, is there any reasons not to use snmp 1, but, 3 or 2 ? -- Voytek -- SLUG - Syd

Re: Compromised Linux box stories (Re: [SLUG] upgrading complicated installs)

Peter Miller wrote: As a profession, we have two choices: 1. start licensing and accrediting ourselves, with a structure we can live with, OR 2. wait for Some Really Bad Shit to happen, with a software defect as the root cause, and have the politicians force something upon us... something baroqu

Re: [SLUG] Sydney Python 5th June meetup postponed... ended up being interesting

Hi All, I've never been to a python user group.. I thought I would go... It turned out to be quite interesting... had enough linux to keep me interested the whole time. They were showing off Amazon Web Services. What it appeared to be was that what they offer access to rack mounted machi

Re: [SLUG] MX problem ?

Mick, thanks, I think you spotted something, I'll check that ___ Sent with SnapperMail www.snappermail.com .. Original Message ... On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:17:02 +1000 >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >: >> > Sorry, I couldn't find any host named autopack.com.au?. (#5.1.2) >> > >One thing I can s

Re: [SLUG] MX problem ?

Hi all, On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:44:45 +1000 (EST) "Voytek Eymont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > one of my users received a reject from an attempted inbound mail as below, > I'm a bit perplexed as to where from is remote mail server looking for > host "autopack.com.au" ? > > domain's mx is 'bilby.s

Re: [SLUG] MX problem ?

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008, Voytek Eymont wrote: > one of my users received a reject from an attempted inbound mail as below, > I'm a bit perplexed as to where from is remote mail server looking for > host "autopack.com.au" ? > > domain's mx is 'bilby.sbt.net.au', and, there is no probs that I can see,

[SLUG] MX problem ?

one of my users received a reject from an attempted inbound mail as below, I'm a bit perplexed as to where from is remote mail server looking for host "autopack.com.au" ? domain's mx is 'bilby.sbt.net.au', and, there is no probs that I can see, any thoughts ? -- > BELOW IS THE REJ

Re: [SLUG] /usr/bin/dpkg returns error code 1

Ouch. Hate when that happens. Reading your log closely, seems like an old package and a new package conflict on a particular file. Run this: dpkg -P libpostproccvs51 Then apt-get -f install. Cheers, - dds Adam Bogacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > for the last two or three weeks I