> "jam" == jam writes:
jam> On Sunday 19 April 2009 10:00:03 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 April 2009 00:16:35 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote: >>
>> I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best
>> I >> can recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP ap
James wrote
> Re: [SLUG] Increasing RAM
> jam
> Sun, 19 Apr 2009 08:04:16 +0800
> slug@slug.org.au
SNIP
...and I activated suspend by dropping an earring
on the keyboard :-)
>
SNIP
> James
To which Daniel commented:
> Daniel Pittman
> Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:44:09 +1000
SNIP
> My immediate respons
Kyle writes:
> Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> Kyle writes:
>>
>>> Maybe, but the last machine I had I ran LVM. I had a hard enough time
>>> remembering which volume belonged to which group belonged to which
>>> disk (and that despite naming them along the lines of;
>>> 'lv00Grp00Hda1', lv01Grp00Hda1').
jam writes:
> On Sunday 19 April 2009 10:00:03 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 April 2009 00:16:35 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
>> >> I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best I
>> >> can recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP approx.~ 2 x RAM. Or
On Sunday 19 April 2009 10:00:03 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
> On Sunday 19 April 2009 00:16:35 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
> >> I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best I
> >> can recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP approx.~ 2 x RAM. Or
> >> was that appr
Daniel Pittman wrote:
Kyle writes:
Maybe, but the last machine I had I ran LVM. I had a hard enough time
remembering which volume belonged to which group belonged to which
disk (and that despite naming them along the lines of;
'lv00Grp00Hda1', lv01Grp00Hda1').
My immediate response to
jam writes:
> On Sunday 19 April 2009 00:16:35 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
>
>> I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best I
>> can recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP approx.~ 2 x RAM. Or
>> was that approx.~ 50% of RAM?
>>
>> Can someone point me in the direct
Kyle writes:
>> First, this would be vastly easier if you used LVM, since that makes
>> allocating space on the fly a universe easier.
>
> Re LVM;
>
> Maybe, but the last machine I had I ran LVM. I had a hard enough time
> remembering which volume belonged to which group belonged to which
> disk
On Sunday 19 April 2009 00:16:35 slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
> I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best I can
> recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP approx.~ 2 x RAM. Or was
> that approx.~ 50% of RAM?
>
> Can someone point me in the direction of an explicit tut
First, this would be vastly easier if you used LVM, since that makes
allocating space on the fly a universe easier.
Re LVM;
Maybe, but the last machine I had I ran LVM. I had a hard enough time
remembering which volume belonged to which group belonged to which disk
(and that despite naming
Amos Shapira writes:
> I used to keep around large swap partitions (that was also before the
> blissful days of LVM2) until someone on the linux-il mailing list
> convinced me that the amount of overhead for the kernel to keep track
> of large amount of swap will actually cause a slow down and re
Kyle writes:
> I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best I
> can recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP approx.~ 2 x RAM. Or
> was that approx.~ 50% of RAM?
As others have said, this was true back in the days when 64MB was a lot
of memory. Now, by the time you are
Jonathan writes:
> I remember that there was at some stage, soemthing with the EULA with
> Windows. Essentially, it can only be valid if you voluntarily accept
> it, therefore, if you don't you can uninstall it, send the CD's and
> documentation back to Microsoft and they have to "refund" you th
I used to keep around large swap partitions (that was also before the
blissful days of LVM2) until someone on the linux-il mailing list
convinced me that the amount of overhead for the kernel to keep track
of large amount of swap will actually cause a slow down and reduction
of ram utilization.
Als
RAM is so cheap now, that if you start using swap heavily people just
drop in a bit more !
I tend to roughly match swap and memory. At least when i first install.
Dean
Michael Chesterton wrote:
On 18/04/2009, at 10:02 PM, Kyle wrote:
Hi Slug,
I've decided to increase the RAM on my home Ce
On 18/04/2009, at 10:02 PM, Kyle wrote:
Hi Slug,
I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best I
can recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP approx.~ 2 x RAM. Or
was that approx.~ 50% of RAM?
Can someone point me in the direction of an explicit tutorial on how
Hi Slug,
I've decided to increase the RAM on my home CentOS server. As best I can
recall, the accepted wisdom is to have SWAP approx.~ 2 x RAM. Or was
that approx.~ 50% of RAM?
Can someone point me in the direction of an explicit tutorial on how I
might go about increasing SWAP without destr
Jonathan wrote:
> I remember that there was at some stage, soemthing with the EULA with
> Windows.
> Essentially, it can only be valid if you voluntarily accept it, therefore, if
> you don't you can uninstall it, send the CD's and documentation back to
> Microsoft and they have to "refund" you
Hi,
I remember that there was at some stage, soemthing with the EULA with Windows.
Essentially, it can only be valid if you voluntarily accept it, therefore, if
you don't you can uninstall it, send the CD's and documentation back to
Microsoft and they have to "refund" you the value.
Never tried
19 matches
Mail list logo
