[SLUG] postgrey

2010-02-10 Thread david
Does anybody have an opinion about postgrey? Does it annoy legitimate users? Slow down the system? Create false positives? Work as intended? Any other thoughts? thanks David. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs:

Re: [SLUG] postgrey

2010-02-10 Thread Lindsay Holmwood
On 10 February 2010 10:15, david da...@kenpro.com.au wrote: Does anybody have an opinion about postgrey? Does it annoy legitimate users? Slow down the system? Create false positives? Work as intended? Any other thoughts? We use it on Rusty (SLUG's mail/web server), and it's the main cause of

Re: [SLUG] postgrey

2010-02-10 Thread Ashley Glenday
I use it on my mail server and I love it. The only time a user notices it is when they're on the phone and someone says they've just sent something. Even then it's only the first time as any further emails in the next 30 days are white listed from that address, IP, combo so no further delays as

Re: [SLUG] postgrey

2010-02-10 Thread Mick Pollard
Hi On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:21 +1100 david da...@kenpro.com.au wrote: Does anybody have an opinion about postgrey? Does it annoy legitimate users? Slow down the system? Create false positives? Work as intended? Any other thoughts? It has proved to reduce UCE/UBE alot for me over the years

Re: [SLUG] postgrey

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:21 +1100 david da...@kenpro.com.au wrote: Does anybody have an opinion about postgrey? Does it annoy legitimate users? Slow down the system? Create false positives? Work as intended? Any other thoughts? It has proved to reduce UCE/UBE alot for me over the years

Re: [SLUG] postgrey

2010-02-10 Thread Jake Anderson
david wrote: Does anybody have an opinion about postgrey? Does it annoy legitimate users? Slow down the system? Create false positives? Work as intended? Any other thoughts? thanks David. I love it. I use that and some dnsRBL's and get ~1 spam a week. one client was getting ~3000 spam

[SLUG] Free online Linux 101 course

2010-02-10 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
This may be of interest to some of our participants. -- Forwarded message -- From: Donna Benjamin do...@cc.com.au Date: 9 February 2010 09:55 Subject: Free online Linux 101 course To: luv-beginners luv-beginn...@luv.asn.au, edu-sig edu-...@luv.asn.au, Open Source Software Mailing

Re: [SLUG] Free online Linux 101 course

2010-02-10 Thread Tony H.G Candito
Looks great. Thanks heaps! On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan srid...@dhanapalan.com wrote: This may be of interest to some of our participants. -- Forwarded message -- From: Donna Benjamin do...@cc.com.au Date: 9 February 2010 09:55 Subject: Free online

[SLUG] problems with perl IO:File binmode

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
I am a failure in mail processing with amavisd/spamassasin -- AFA05B44845 3085241 Thu Feb 11 10:07:31 s...@hotmail.com (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=21117-12, mime_decode-1 FAILED: Can't locate object method binmode via package IO::File at

Re: [SLUG] problems with perl IO:File binmode

2010-02-10 Thread Steve Kowalik
Voytek Eymont wrote: AFA05B44845 3085241 Thu Feb 11 10:07:31 s...@hotmail.com (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=21117-12, mime_decode-1 FAILED: Can't locate object method binmode via package IO::File at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/MIME/Body.pm line 437.

Re: [SLUG] problems with perl IO:File binmode

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, February 11, 2010 3:28 pm, Steve Kowalik wrote: Voytek Eymont wrote: The error is in MIME::Body. which is calling something that IO::File no longer provides. Try and upgrade MIME::Body? Steve, thanks I tried