[SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Rod Butcher
I need to have a smartphone as part of my job needs me to be be able to use and be familiar with all the new social media communications tools. Initial research indicates that Android-based phones have the highest market share and are best value for money. And of course I like Linux. Are

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread simran
some adhoc feedback... i have found that podcasts dont work as well on android (especially enhanced podcasts - which i think are an apple propritary thing anyway, surprise surprise!!! :) i personally prefer android anyday, get the phone, root it (or not), and you have way way way more control

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Ken Foskey
I owned an IPhone for a number of years and recently got a android galaxy II. First comment is that they are all slippery suckers. 16 year old has destroyed a number of phones just by dropping them out of his pockets. Deep pockets are a must (that is literal). Look after them and don't

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Phil Manuel
I used to use pocketcast but sharing a link was forced via pocketcast I currently use Google Reader, for the subscription to pocketcasts, and playback via Google Listen. It's shame it has to be two apps. On 2/02/12 10:08 PM, simran wrote: some adhoc feedback... i have found that podcasts

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Jeremy Visser
On 2/02/12 20:42, Rod Butcher wrote: Are there any things they can't do or can't connect to/interface with, which other proprietary systems can ? Not really, all there are lots of things it can't do that an open system can. Like logging in as root. Or, y'know, compiling the whole OS from

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Marghanita da Cruz
Jeremy Visser wrote: On 2/02/12 20:42, Rod Butcher wrote: Are there any things they can't do or can't connect to/interface with, which other proprietary systems can ? Not really, all there are lots of things it can't do that an open system can. Like logging in as root. Or, y'know, compiling

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Troy Rollo
On Friday 03 February 2012 08:25:40 Jeremy Visser wrote: Sadly, people these days don't care and this post will be ignored. Amazingly enough, not even technical or otherwise FOSS–loving people seem to care. Blah blah pragmatism blah blah works well enough. Nothing about principles. Some of us

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Jake Anderson
On 02/03/2012 09:21 AM, Marghanita da Cruz wrote: Thinking out loud, has anyone played with 4G(LTE) or dual/band smartphones - do such things exist? I played with a HTC 4G device at a telstra shop yesterday in penrith, speedtest gave me 20mbit down and 3mbit up. ping was 82ms. looking

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Fri, February 3, 2012 9:21 am, Marghanita da Cruz wrote: Given the issues with Battery life, seems there is some scope for tuning either customised/personal/individual or across the op system. I expect, things like the WiFi are hungry and even leaving the OS running, while you wait for a

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, February 2, 2012 10:30 pm, Ken Foskey wrote: I owned an IPhone for a number of years and recently got a android galaxy II. I got my very first 'smart' phone about 6 month ago, Android, never had or used iPhone or any other 'smart' phone prior like my phone, Blur was OK, CM7 is good

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Fri, February 3, 2012 10:02 am, Jake Anderson wrote: Thinking out loud, has anyone played with 4G(LTE) or dual/band smartphones - do such things exist? I played with a HTC 4G device at a telstra shop yesterday in penrith, speedtest gave me 20mbit down and 3mbit up. ping was 82ms. looking

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Fri, February 3, 2012 10:24 am, Voytek Eymont wrote: phone is OK, (but Gorilla Glass is no much for roadside gravel) oops, 'match' oh, yes, and, in spite of my prior moanings here, SIP VOIP over 3G now works on my phone, seems my issues were phone/Motorola releated rather than anything

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Rod Butcher
Thanks for all the feedback - Galaxy Nexus sounds like a contender. I think it comes down to the range of apps available for the OS, correct ? So are there important apps for IPHone and Windows Phone that Android lacks or doesn't have apps that can provide equivalent functionality ? Clunkiness

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread simran
Hey Jeremy, You don't sound like a troll... just someone who has been around a long time and is used to doing it all themselves. I think people do care... but there is a lot more specialisation now... it's like medicne an ENT specialist doesn't know much about the legs... but because he has

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Zenaan Harkness
The most important app to me is that Libre app. Called Freedom or something... not sure what others call it sometimes. If you so insist on a self-centered reason: there's that big brouhaha what, just December or something (can someone remember the name please)? about that key-logging binary blob

Re: [SLUG] Android-based smartphones - any drawbacks ?

2012-02-02 Thread Rod Butcher
I'm not at the cutting edge, I just need to have a smartphone that can do most things and is open-source without participating in holy wars. Can you clarify your comments ? thanks Rod On 02/03/12 14:30, Zenaan Harkness wrote: The most important app to me is that Libre app. Called Freedom or