Jeff,
The most annoying anti-spam method in the world. A sure-fire way to not get
mail from anyone.
If you get *no* e-mail, it follows that you don't get any *spam* e-mail
as well...
DSL
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs:
Adam,
Any time a spam strategy is predictably imperfect, that is a specific
type of spam gets through, you've essentially created a scenario in
which you have a strong evolutionary selection towards that type of spam.
And so the percentages will start to grow as more spammers use that
David Lloyd wrote:
Jeff,
The most annoying anti-spam method in the world. A sure-fire way to
not get
mail from anyone.
If you get *no* e-mail, it follows that you don't get any *spam* e-mail
as well...
I'm unplugging my computer RIGHT N
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -
On 08/11/06, Peter Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm unplugging my computer RIGHT N
Wow, that's really cool. Can you teach me how to send an email character by
character right up until the point that I pull the power?
I wouldn't have to keep saving my multi page rants for fear of haning
Michael Brown wrote:
On 08/11/06, Peter Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm unplugging my computer RIGHT N
Wow, that's really cool. Can you teach me how to send an email character by
character right up until the point that I pull the power?
I wouldn't have to keep saving my multi page rants
* On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:24:00AM +, Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The business gets some 500 spam / day. spamassassin gets about 300-400 (The
spammers are getting really clever).
I suggest you outsource your spam filtering to
Or just accept that your anti-spam setup is going to get x% of the spam,
and beyond that you're better off putting your efforts into something
else - like learning a decent mail client that allows you to quickly get
rid of any spam that got thru... Did someone say mutt?
Any time a spam strategy
Hi
A customer has told me he has heard of this anti-spam technique.
Will I implement it for them?
Any body got any pointers for me please.
Heck it would be a nice slug solution too:
* You send me an email
* If your address is in my white-database no further ado
* If it is not in my DB I reject
On 2006.11.03 10:29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
A customer has told me he has heard of this anti-spam technique.
Will I implement it for them?
Any body got any pointers for me please.
Heck it would be a nice slug solution too:
* You send me an email
* If your address is in my white-database no
quote who=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* If it is not in my DB I reject the mail, send you a reply explaining,
with an attached obscure image of a number.
The most annoying anti-spam method in the world. A sure-fire way to not get
mail from anyone.
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:48:10AM EST, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* If it is not in my DB I reject the mail, send you a reply explaining,
with an attached obscure image of a number.
The most annoying anti-spam method in the world. A sure-fire way to not get
mail from
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 07:29 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
A customer has told me he has heard of this anti-spam technique.
Will I implement it for them?
Any body got any pointers for me please.
Heck it would be a nice slug solution too:
...
I have a policy for this approach: I blacklist
$quoted_author = [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
Any body got any pointers for me please.
Challenge-Response Anti-Spam Systems Considered Harmful
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/challenge-response.html
cheers
marty
--
supine: From the Latin for lying on one's back, to be supine has come to mean
On Friday 03 November 2006 07:51, you wrote:
A customer has told me he has heard of this anti-spam technique.
Will I implement it for them?
Any body got any pointers for me please.
Heck it would be a nice slug solution too:
* You send me an email
* If your address is in my
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The business gets some 500 spam / day. spamassassin gets about 300-400 (The
spammers are getting really clever).
I suggest you outsource your spam filtering to someone who can better
that rate, without you having to spend oodles of time
On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
A customer has told me he has heard of this anti-spam technique.
Will I implement it for them?
Any body got any pointers for me please.
Heck it would be a nice slug solution too:
* You send me an email
* If your address is in my
Martin Barry wrote:
$quoted_author = [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
Any body got any pointers for me please.
Challenge-Response Anti-Spam Systems Considered Harmful
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/challenge-response.html
A significant percentage of the points against stem from the habit of
This one time, at band camp, Mikolaj Habryn wrote:
doing the C-R offline, after the initial received delivery. Doing it in
real-time and responding with a 5xx at SMTP delivery time ameliorates a
chunk of them.
So you're expecting lusers to trawl through the text of a bounce message
and
18 matches
Mail list logo