On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:46:35PM +1100, Joel Heenan wrote:
> Hi,
>
[snip]
>
> Sorry I didn't mean to say differences I meant to say distances. The
> DR site is a good 20km away. I have not researched this thoroughly but
> it was my understanding that GFS was designed for fibre connected
> volum
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Joel Heenan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In response to Adrian I'm looking for a solution that will work well under
> RHEL.
I hate to say it, but you bought RHEL, so ask Redhat.
Thats part of the benefit of buying a product with support - you can ask
their engineers what will "work we
Hi,
In response to Adrian I'm looking for a solution that will work well under RHEL.
Thanks for the suggestions thus far I'll check them out now. Comments below
On 1/16/08, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:15:51PM +1100, Joel Heenan wrote:
> > SLUG,
> >
> > We h
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:15:51PM +1100, Joel Heenan wrote:
> SLUG,
>
> We have a requirement in a new project to have a distributed
> filesystem. Files are written to one of 32 * 200MB volumes and we need
> to keep them in sync with a DR site. Rsync, I believe, will be just
> too slow to replica
Under Linux? DRDB? http://www.linux-ha.org/DRDB/
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008, Joel Heenan wrote:
> SLUG,
>
> We have a requirement in a new project to have a distributed
> filesystem. Files are written to one of 32 * 200MB volumes and we need
> to keep them in sync with a DR site. Rsync, I believe, wil
SLUG,
We have a requirement in a new project to have a distributed
filesystem. Files are written to one of 32 * 200MB volumes and we need
to keep them in sync with a DR site. Rsync, I believe, will be just
too slow to replicate changes - unless there is some way to make the
rsync daemon hook into
