Re: [SLUG] Document Storage - Webdav

2002-08-27 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I thought WEBDAV just let you save/retrieve via HTTP. Nice but not a > document management system. It's a really helpful component of a document managment system based on open standards / Free Software though... - Jeff -- I must be getting old... Buying toothpaste with gel in it is no l

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage - Webdav

2002-08-27 Thread Stuart
I thought WEBDAV just let you save/retrieve via HTTP. Nice but not a document management system. Stu On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 23:45, Jan Schmidt wrote: > > > OpenOffice supports webdav which is something to do with document > > management. Google for webdav and take a look I dont know anything >

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-27 Thread Jan Schmidt
> OpenOffice supports webdav which is something to do with document > management. Google for webdav and take a look I dont know anything > about it just read snippets on the OpenOffice.org mailing lists. > Webdav is Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning... it's about extensions to the HTTP

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-27 Thread Ken Foskey
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 14:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We use Notes for email which can easily be replaced. However, we also use > it for document storage. Instead of word processing in something like word > or Openoffice we use Notes. It is a little primitive but has all the > features you

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-27 Thread lukekendall
On 27 Aug, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > could then convert most of our desktops to Linux only. At present I run > VMware on one workstation as an experiment just to give him Notes and one > DOS application (DBASE) that doesn't (or at least wouldn't when I last > tried it) seem to want to run

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-27 Thread Angus Lees
At Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:43:11 +1100, steven wrote: > Does anyone have any suggestions about how I might provide the central > document storage, searching and summaries provided by Notes? Then I might > be on the way to being Microsoft free. store them on a shared drive (samba/nfs/whatever). the

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-27 Thread Matthew Hannigan
Bruce Badger wrote: > If the documents you are talking about are just text, and need to be > shared and editable with a revision history, you could look at using a > wiki. Twiki is also apparently good. I'd look at doing something like web seaarch engine (htdig) plus samba.Integration of

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-27 Thread steven
Jeff Thanks for the suggestion. However, that replaces windows at the sever end but not the desktop. While I find that Notes does fulfill a lot of our needs it is still proprietary and licences aren't cheap. I guess you use windows based native Notes clients. If I could get a suitable client

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-26 Thread sfg
Hi Steven I've been thinking about this and Open Office/J2EE backend. It sounds like a pretty good fit for your requirements. For starters, it sounds like Open Office will give your users many more opportunities re: formatting than notes currently does. The reason it's of interest as a Docume

Re: [SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-26 Thread Bruce Badger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... >Does anyone have any suggestions about how I might provide the central >document storage, searching and summaries provided by Notes? Then I might >be on the way to being Microsoft free. > If the documents you are talking about are just text, and need to be shared

[SLUG] Document Storage

2002-08-26 Thread steven
Over the years I have been gradually reducing our reliance on Windows. Our main ERP application runs on the Progress RDBMS under Linux. Really the only thing left now is Lotus notes. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like there will be a linux client in the short term. They have now discontinued

Re: [SLUG] document storage and serving

2002-06-01 Thread Michael Still
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We have a little over a thousand 1 or 2 page documents stored in native > notes format. They are things like product specifications, recipies, etc. > These are available to staff internally using native notes access. Notes > serves these up to the w

Re: [SLUG] document storage and serving

2002-06-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> 3) I suspect in the long run it is going to be easier and more efficient to > store all the text in a RDBMS than as text files I'm in the process of building a document management system as you've described above, but just wanted to give you an inconsequential, but perhaps knowledge-encouragi

[SLUG] document storage and serving

2002-06-01 Thread steven
I am sure this is going to end up a long email so I will apologise in advance. I am looking for some advice as to what direction to take in a project I am considering at work. We currently use Lotus Notes for email and document storage. (This is my fault, a decision made 6 or 7 years ago before