Re: [SLUG] Mozilla 0.6

2000-12-28 Thread Peter Rundle
This message is sent from Mozilla 0.6. It is certainly not completely stable yet, but has improved quite a lot since M18. Anyone else using it? I've tried it on RH6.2 and it is a lot more stable and generally better but has a couple of nasty bugs. Any dialog/form that you enter a "." into

Re: [SLUG] Mozilla 0.6

2000-12-28 Thread Dean Hamstead
I've tried it on RH6.2 and it is a lot more stable and generally better but has a couple of nasty bugs. Any dialog/form that you enter a "." into gets converted into "%A9" which makes it really really hard to put your e-mail address into a form. Java Script still doesn't work for quite a

[SLUG] Mozilla 0.6

2000-12-27 Thread Heracles
This message is sent from Mozilla 0.6. It is certainly not completely stable yet, but has improved quite a lot since M18. Anyone else using it? I keep getting an error about a module I have not heard of when I load Mozilla: modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-10 All seems to work OK without

Re: [SLUG] Mozilla 0.6

2000-12-27 Thread Anand Kumria
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 11:54:38PM +1100, Heracles wrote: This message is sent from Mozilla 0.6. It is certainly not completely stable yet, but has improved quite a lot since M18. Anyone else using it? I keep getting an error about a module I have not heard of when I load Mozilla:

Re: [SLUG] Mozilla 0.6

2000-12-27 Thread Howard Lowndes
Try: modprobe -c | grep net-pf-10 to see if it aliases to anything recognisable. Otherwise put a line in /etc/conf.modules like: alias net-pf-10 off -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates http://lannetlinux.com "...well, it worked before