On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:31:08PM +1000, CaT wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:03:49PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> > I can't remember EVER getting St George ones, although they've warned
> > about them before.
>
> You're just not popular enough with the right crowd :)
>
> 165 N + Apr 14 St.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:03:49PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> I can't remember EVER getting St George ones, although they've warned
> about them before.
You're just not popular enough with the right crowd :)
165 N + Apr 14 St. George Bank ( 77) St. George Bank Phone Verification
166 N Oct
I can't remember EVER getting St George ones, although they've warned
about them before.
Adam K
Matthew Hannigan wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:24:10AM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
Ditto.
I for one loved the Java web banking site. I felt something of a mild
sense of security in that it was
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:24:10AM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> Ditto.
>
> I for one loved the Java web banking site. I felt something of a mild
> sense of security in that it was the only site that couldn't be
> trivially screen-scraped. (although I did discover a way later on to
> emulate the
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 10:35:36AM EST, John Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:49:42 +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
>
> > Now if I could just try and work out the damn URL used to load the
> > sign-in screen, I just might be able to use the damn thing in elinks. :)
>
> This one?:
>
>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:49:42 +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
> Now if I could just try and work out the damn URL used to load the
> sign-in screen, I just might be able to use the damn thing in elinks. :)
This one?:
https://ibank.stgeorge.com.au/html/index.asp?redirected=True&JavaVendor=SU
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 09:24:10AM EST, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> Ditto.
>
> I for one loved the Java web banking site. I felt something of a mild
> sense of security in that it was the only site that couldn't be
> trivially screen-scraped. (although I did discover a way later on to
> emulate the c
Ditto.
I for one loved the Java web banking site. I felt something of a mild
sense of security in that it was the only site that couldn't be
trivially screen-scraped. (although I did discover a way later on to
emulate the client-server protocol).
I consider the move to HTML a step back.
Tha
This one time, at band camp, Byron Hillis wrote:
> Unlike the current Westpac version that attempts to get around
> "keyloggers" by using an on-screen keyboard in alphabetical order, which
> makes it obvious to anyone looking over your shoulder what your password
> is. On top of this, only capital
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 02:26:41PM +1000, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> Menno Schaaf wrote:
> > Never had any issues with the java based one... The migration is a
> > gradual one, so not all people may have access to it yet. I've only
> > just got switched across yesterday...
>
> I never had any issues
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:10:01 +0100, Rev Simon Rumble wrote:
> Still, I'm a bit disappointed that they still don't support Firefox but
That's not what they told me when I first started using the new HTML
interface a few months ago, and on this page:
https://www.stgeorge.com.au/int_bank/s
Menno Schaaf wrote:
> Never had any issues with the java based one... The migration is a
> gradual one, so not all people may have access to it yet. I've only
> just got switched across yesterday...
I never had any issues with the java based one either, but then I followed the
advice at http://puz
This one time, at band camp, Ben wrote:
> Awesome. I wrote them a (hard copy) letter complaining about the Java
> interface a few months ago. I just got a standard response, but maybe
> it did end up helping them see the light.
I think you underestimate the amount of time a bank will spend
devel
On 10/16/06, Simon Males <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When logging in, you'll have the option of going to the Java based
interface or the new (HTML) interface.
Awesome. I wrote them a (hard copy) letter complaining about the Java
interface a few months ago. I just got a standard response, but ma
Never had any issues with the java based one... The migration is a
gradual one, so not all people may have access to it yet. I've only
just got switched across yesterday...
On 10/16/06, Simon Males <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When logging in, you'll have the option of going to the Java based
int
When logging in, you'll have the option of going to the Java based
interface or the new (HTML) interface.
Posting this as some time ago Sluggers were having issues with the Java
interface.
http://www.stgeorge.com.au/
--
Simon Males <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Ma
16 matches
Mail list logo