[Very, very much my personal opinion, not that of my employer
in any way shape or form.]
Ben Donohue wrote:
1. I thought that numbers were supposed to be portable by law.
They are. But the telcos wrote the rules :-(
Your typical home number is a geographical number and is assigned
to a
Hi all,
Recently I put an order in with Exetel to get ADSL2+ on my phone number.
I received an email back from Exetel saying that Telstra has issued a
Telstra Rejection Advice Report on the phone number and it is not
portable from the Telstra network to Optus!
There are two things wrong with
It may be on a Telstra RIM (no other companies can put their hardware
in RIMs, only in the exchanges)
The portability they require is to physically move your line from the
Telstra DSLAM to an Optus DSLAM (since Exetel use Optus as their DSLAM
provider). This is not the same thing as number
On 1/8/07, Ben Donohue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I put an order in with Exetel to get ADSL2+ on my phone number.
I received an email back from Exetel saying that Telstra has issued a
Telstra Rejection Advice Report on the phone number and it is not
portable from the Telstra
On 09/01/2007, at 1:22 AM, Ben wrote:
It may be on a Telstra RIM (no other companies can put their hardware
in RIMs, only in the exchanges)
The portability they require is to physically move your line from the
Telstra DSLAM to an Optus DSLAM (since Exetel use Optus as their DSLAM
provider).
