[EMAIL PROTECTED] was once rumoured to have said:
> Geez don't get testie, I email SLUG CAUSE I NEEDED HELP.. far out...
If you want help, then state your problem, and what you want help
with. What you did instead was make poor assumptions, and ask
questions based upon those assumptions, without
QBE
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Packet Fragmenting and IP_MASQ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was once rumoured to have said:
> Hello all,
>
> I just figured out why my router wouldn't work. The MTU of the external
> interface was 1472 (i set that) and I read th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was once rumoured to have said:
> Hello all,
>
> I just figured out why my router wouldn't work. The MTU of the external
> interface was 1472 (i set that) and I read the thing about IP_masq code not
> liking non-fragmented packets.. So just a quick couple of questions..
Uh
Hello all,
I just figured out why my router wouldn't work. The MTU of the external
interface was 1472 (i set that) and I read the thing about IP_masq code not
liking non-fragmented packets.. So just a quick couple of questions..
1) Isn't it faster if it doens't have to fragment the packet??
