On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:12:14PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:03:30 +1100, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> > If you are willing to comment on your use of P2P technology, please
> > contact the SLUG committee, and we'll pass your details on.
>
> I used a web browser once and I believe
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > I used a web browser once and I believe there was no globally
> > > centralised server involved at any point. Does that count?
> > Not unless you use a very loose definition of "p2p" - it's a
> > client-server technology.
> >
> > Decentralis
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I used a web browser once and I believe there was no globally
> > centralised server involved at any point. Does that count?
> Not unless you use a very loose definition of "p2p" - it's a
> client-server technology.
>
> Decentralised != p2p
Zeroc
> I used a web browser once and I believe there was no globally
> centralised server involved at any point. Does that count?
Not unless you use a very loose definition of "p2p" - it's a
client-server technology.
Decentralised != p2p
James the cranky
--
...so there I am at ten thousand feet wit
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:12:14PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:03:30 +1100, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> > If you are willing to comment on your use of P2P technology, please
> > contact the SLUG committee, and we'll pass your details on.
>
> I used a web browser once and I believe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> He claims to be a freelancer.
Oh and he did specific a publisher by name. I'm not prepared to reveal
names and details of ctte correspondents on an archived list like this
one, but if people are curious ask offlist.
-Mary
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, David wrote:
> Ask the dude for his company/news organisation NAME (eg, News Limited,
> whatever) and look up there number in the phone book and ask for
> him/her by name. If he can't provide this simple detail, then he is a
> dud. I get lots of them.
He claims to be a freela
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> Can anyone who would like their contact details to be provided to this
> reporter (I have no way of confirming his own legitimacy, sorry, no
> magical powers here), please let me know.
>
A problem I often face, and one that is easily overcome:
Ask t
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps we should ask them which parts they think are not legal.
"They" didn't use the word 'legal', "they" used the word 'legitimate'.
Can anyone who would like their contact details to be provided to this
reporter (I have no way of confirming his
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:12:14PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> I used a web browser once and I believe there was no globally
> centralised server involved at any point. Does that count?
>
> (More seriously, all the good bits of the Internet are P2P networks.)
Exactly my thoughts. The internet is
At Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:03:30 +1100, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> If you are willing to comment on your use of P2P technology, please
> contact the SLUG committee, and we'll pass your details on.
I used a web browser once and I believe there was no globally
centralised server involved at any point. Does
Hmmm sounds like a sting operation.
Yes it does, doesn't it?
"All P2P is illegal;...
Well... Probably close to "all"... but not "all".
I have seen (and even skimmed one) articles on the use of P2P to share
documents and media files. This is within the organization that owns said
documents, media
> > SLUG committee has had a reporter request the contact details of people
> > who are making legitimate (by which I presume he means legal) use of P2P
> > technologies.
Hmmm sounds like a sting operation.
"All P2P is illegal; underground hackers want publicity (that's why they
go underground
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> SLUG committee has had a reporter request the contact details of people
> who are making legitimate (by which I presume he means legal) use of P2P
> technologies. He's looking for 'experts' to comment, but the article is
> for laypeople.
>
> If you are w
SLUG committee has had a reporter request the contact details of people
who are making legitimate (by which I presume he means legal) use of P2P
technologies. He's looking for 'experts' to comment, but the article is
for laypeople.
If you are willing to comment on your use of P2P technology, pleas
15 matches
Mail list logo