On Wednesday 31 May 2006 15:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send slug mailing list submissions to
slug@slug.org.au
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
This one time, at band camp, Martin Visser wrote:
I still do obfuscate my email address in my .signature when I use my
work account, but I have to admit it probably doesn't make a heck of
difference now. Basically if you are seeing 30 spams or say a day
(which is what I max out on) your address
Mary Gardiner wrote:
Just for interests' sake, SLUG is also available via NNTP (Usenet news) on
gmane.org for both posting and reading.
Just what I really want. Another source of email addresses for spammers
to pillage.
Who was responsible for this bright idea?
If you are goingto start passing
I am strongly in favour of all mailing lists such as SLUG being
subscriber only, and definitely not being made available to (wo)man+dog.
Terry Collins wrote:
Mary Gardiner wrote:
Just for interests' sake, SLUG is also available via NNTP (Usenet news) on
gmane.org for both posting and reading.
I am not an expert on statistics, but my feeling is that once your
email has already made it to one one of the spammers specials - DVD
containing one billon emails for $100 - then having your email (even
if it is obfuscated) on more public mail/nntp/whatever archives isn't
really going to make a
Martin Visser wrote:
(Anybody get more than 50 spams to a single email address on average?)
I hve one address [EMAIL PROTECTED] that I have had for about 8 years
and used to post to mailing lists, usenet and register a domain name
gets about 20 spams an hour 24/7. I use it as a spam trap.
Erik
Howard Lowndes wrote:
I am strongly in favour of all mailing lists such as SLUG being
subscriber only, and definitely not being made available to (wo)man+dog.
Yep, after this, I've changed my belief.
The SYDNEY in SLUG is what matters to me. If I want to support the rest
of the world, there
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 01:02:51AM +1000, Terry Collins wrote:
Mary Gardiner wrote:
Just for interests' sake, SLUG is also available via NNTP (Usenet news) on
gmane.org for both posting and reading.
Just what I really want. Another source of email addresses for spammers
to pillage.
Andrew Bennetts wrote:
As http://gmane.org/expiry.php points out, you can set headers if you wish
to
declare that your messages should not be archived.
The issue is not whether to archive or not archive. I agree that we want
to retain the collective wisdom/brain-farts that these posts
SLUG feeding spam to the world wrote:
The issue is the spreading around of valid email addresses,
particularly when this has been done so surreptitiously[1].
You are assuming that this was an active decision to not tell
people. I think you are wrong. It may have happened without
the knowledge
Just for interests' sake, SLUG is also available via NNTP (Usenet news) on
gmane.org for both posting and reading. This doesn't require registering for
any accounts, but you will need to do a confirmation on the very first message
you send.
The NNTP server is news.gmane.org and here are the
11 matches
Mail list logo
