med above and may
> contain information that is confidential, proprietary or
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> notify HP immediately by return email and then delete the
> email, destroy any printed
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:48:21AM +1100, david wrote:
> If I understand all this properly, I have two sane choices:
>
> * put a dumb hub between the router and network switch, plug a
> promiscuous box into it and run something like ethereal on it
Or pmacct (promiscuous mode ip accounting) ht
tity named above and may contain information that is
> confidential, proprietary or privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify HP immediately by return email and then delete the
> email, destroy any printed copy and do not disclose or use the information
> in it.
>
tely by return email and then delete
> >> the email, destroy any printed copy and do not disclose or use the
> >> information in it.
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aleksey
On 09/01/2008, at 9:33 AM, Dean Hamstead wrote:
that solution will give all traffic, not just internet traffic.
traffic between hosts, i assume, isnt a problem?
graphing the physical interface will, but snmpd returns any data you
tell it to, including traffic to and from a gateway, ports,
elete the email, destroy
any printed copy and do not disclose or use the information in it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aleksey
Tsalolikhin
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2008 4:10 PM
To: slug@slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] measuring traffic
that solution will give all traffic, not just internet traffic.
traffic between hosts, i assume, isnt a problem?
Dean
Michael Chesterton wrote:
On 08/01/2008, at 3:49 PM, david wrote:
I have a local network for which I do not have access to the gateway
host.
What tool would folk suggest t
l and then delete the
> email, destroy any printed copy and do not disclose or use the information in
> it.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aleksey
> Tsalolikhin
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2008 4:10 PM
> T
On 08/01/2008, at 3:49 PM, david wrote:
I have a local network for which I do not have access to the gateway
host.
What tool would folk suggest to determine what and how much traffic is
going to what port on which host?
I've got 8 hosts on the network which are a mixture of mac and linux,
mos
then delete the email, destroy
any printed copy and do not disclose or use the information in it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aleksey
Tsalolikhin
Sent: Tuesday, 8 January 2008 4:10 PM
To: slug@slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] measurin
Have you tried ntop? It should show you what the top usage is on your
network. That might be the answer you are looking for.
Best,
-at
On Jan 7, 2008 8:49 PM, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a local network for which I do not have access to the gateway
> host.
>
> What tool would folk
if you cant get at the gateway
you could set up monitoring on each host...
or set up a machine configured as a bridge to measure the
throughput. this would be invisible to both the
hosts and the gateway.
Dean
david wrote:
I have a local network for which I do not have access to the gatewa
I have a local network for which I do not have access to the gateway
host.
What tool would folk suggest to determine what and how much traffic is
going to what port on which host?
I've got 8 hosts on the network which are a mixture of mac and linux,
mostly on public IP addresses, and the bandwidt
13 matches
Mail list logo
