On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 09:16:59AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:39:17AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I want to look at a config file that uses ; as comments, but I want to
> > look at everything that is not a commented line
> >
> > so I tried grep -v '^\W*
Stuart Guthrie wrote:
> Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
> list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
>
> Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
>
> standard a-z/A-Z
> arabic numbers 0-9
> special chars %$#@
^
([A-Za-z]([0-9]|[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks everyone for some great help. I thought there might be a couple
of regex gurus out there!
Stuart
On Nov 9, 2007 5:42 PM, Roger Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me
> > at a list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve
> Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me
> at a list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
>
> Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
>
> standard a-z/A-Z
> arabic numbers 0-9
> special chars %$#@
Is there a constraint requiring that this be done with
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
standard a-z/A-Z
arabic numbers 0-9
special chars %$#@
What's wrong with brute force?
bool password_characters_good_choice(char *s) {
int matches;
matches = (match("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz", s) +
Phil Scarratt wrote:
Rick Welykochy wrote:
Stuart Guthrie wrote:
Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
standard a-z/A-Z
arabic numbers 0-9
special chars %$#@
Phil Scarratt wrote:
Rick Welykochy wrote:
Stuart Guthrie wrote:
Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
standard a-z/A-Z
arabic numbers 0-9
special chars %$#@
Rick Welykochy wrote:
Stuart Guthrie wrote:
Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
standard a-z/A-Z
arabic numbers 0-9
special chars %$#@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[A-Z
Rick Welykochy wrote:
Stuart Guthrie wrote:
Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
standard a-z/A-Z
arabic numbers 0-9
special chars %$#@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[A-Z
On 09/11/07 15:39:54, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
> Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone
> could point me at a list, forum or just give
> me a pointer on how to achieve this:
>
> Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
>
> standard a-z/A-Z
> arabic numbers 0-9
> special chars %$#@
A crude b
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 15:39:54 +1100, "Stuart Guthrie"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
> list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
>
> Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
>
> standard a-z/A-Z
> arabic numbers 0-9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/11/2007 04:48:20 PM:
> Stuart Guthrie wrote:
>
> > Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
> > list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
> >
> > Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
> >
> > standard a-z/A-Z
> > ara
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 04:48:20PM +1100, Rick Welykochy wrote:
> Stuart Guthrie wrote:
>
>> Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
>> list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
>> Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
>> standard a-z/A-Z
>> arabic
Stuart Guthrie wrote:
Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
standard a-z/A-Z
arabic numbers 0-9
special chars %$#@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[A-Za-z0-9]+|[EMAIL PROTECT
Stuart Guthrie wrote:
> Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
> list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
>
> Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
>
> standard a-z/A-Z
> arabic numbers 0-9
> special chars %$#@
Thats not that great a specifica
Not being a regex expert I was hoping someone could point me at a
list, forum or just give me a pointer on how to achieve this:
Field that must have 2 out of 3 of these:
standard a-z/A-Z
arabic numbers 0-9
special chars %$#@
Best regards
Stuart Guthrie
Director
Polonious Pty Ltd
(w) http://www.
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 22:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I missed the beginning of this discussion (I've just re-subscribed this
> week)
> but what's the reason that the original author wants this in a single RE?
Used in application they cannot change... I suggested running
application 4 times, m
I missed the beginning of this discussion (I've just re-subscribed this
week)
but what's the reason that the original author wants this in a single RE?
Malcolm V wrote:
Ben de Luca (bedel) wrote:
probably want to write a script to write the regex :)
10 points for the first code snippit that gener
Ben de Luca (bedel) wrote:
probably want to write a script to write the regex :)
10 points for the first code snippit that generates it !!!
On 04/08/2004, at 3:43 PM, Alexander Samad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:52:28PM +1000, Stuart Cooper wrote:
Must match 3 out of 4 rules
Must much at le
probably want to write a script to write the regex :)
10 points for the first code snippit that generates it !!!
On 04/08/2004, at 3:43 PM, Alexander Samad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:52:28PM +1000, Stuart Cooper wrote:
Must match 3 out of 4 rules
Must much at least 3 out of 4 rules I would
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:52:28PM +1000, Stuart Cooper wrote:
>
> > > >Must match 3 out of 4 rules
>
> Must much at least 3 out of 4 rules I would
> imagine, the more oblique the password the
> better.
>
> > > >1) Contain 1 or more Uppercase char
> > > >2) Contain 1 or more Lowercase char
> > >
> > >Must match 3 out of 4 rules
Must much at least 3 out of 4 rules I would
imagine, the more oblique the password the
better.
> > >1) Contain 1 or more Uppercase char
> > >2) Contain 1 or more Lowercase char
> > >3) Contain 1 or more numeric
> > >4) Contain 1 or more punctuation
> looking fo
This one time, at band camp, Alexander Samad wrote:
>looking for 1 regex statement and perlre is the standard I think, the
>sort of thing I was thinking of but really ugly was (where [:1:] - set
>of chars that meets rule 1 above)
>
> ([:1:]+[:2:]+[:3:]+|[:1:]+[:2:]+[:4:]+|...) rather long and painf
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:24:09PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Alexander Samad wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >
> >a friend has to implement in regex something along these lines of these
> >rules to match against a string (password)
> >
> >Must match 3 out of 4 rules
> >
> >1)
This one time, at band camp, Alexander Samad wrote:
>Hi
>
>
>a friend has to implement in regex something along these lines of these
>rules to match against a string (password)
>
>Must match 3 out of 4 rules
>
>1) Contain 1 or more Uppercase char
>2) Contain 1 or more Lowercase char
>3) Contain 1
Hi
a friend has to implement in regex something along these lines of these
rules to match against a string (password)
Must match 3 out of 4 rules
1) Contain 1 or more Uppercase char
2) Contain 1 or more Lowercase char
3) Contain 1 or more numeric
4) Contain 1 or more punctuation
Thanks
Alex
> than time spent coding it.
> 2. The code you grab out of a library has most likely been used at least
> thousands of times and thus is thousands time less likely to contain
> bugs/flaws.
> 3. It will make your code more readable to the person who has to look at it
> after you.
But i need it for
heers,
Dave.
--
David Zverina
Alt Key Pty. Ltd.
http://www.altkey.com
PO Box 3121, Parramatta, 2124, Australia
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jason Rennie
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 January 2001 14:16
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > I need to parse a date of the form DD/MM/
> > > ^[0-3][0-9]\/[01][0-9]\/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]$
> >
> > Thanks john,
> >
> > This will discover if the date is not of the form DD/MM/ right ?
>
> no the above will match if the date is of that form so just negate the
> return value o
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 02:29:04PM +1100, Jason Rennie wrote:
> > > I need to parse a date of the form DD/MM/
> > ^[0-3][0-9]\/[01][0-9]\/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]$
>
> Thanks john,
>
> This will discover if the date is not of the form DD/MM/ right ?
no the above will match if the date is of
> > I need to parse a date of the form DD/MM/
> ^[0-3][0-9]\/[01][0-9]\/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]$
Thanks john,
This will discover if the date is not of the form DD/MM/ right ?
Or am i reading it wrong ?
Jason
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Inf
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 02:16:03PM +1100, Jason Rennie wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Given the number of Regex guru's on this list.
>
> I'm using the gnu c++ string lib which apparently will accept regex's for
> its string.contains() function call.
>
> I need to parse a date of the form DD/MM/
^[0-
Hi all,
Given the number of Regex guru's on this list.
I'm using the gnu c++ string lib which apparently will accept regex's for
its string.contains() function call.
I need to parse a date of the form DD/MM/
and I need to check that is looks exactly like that.
Nothing but intergers and s
33 matches
Mail list logo
