On 0, Russell Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ; i want to get rid of sendmail and put in an easier to configure
> ; equivelant. i also want to transfer the current emails that are read
> ; through sendmail.
> ;
> ; so, can anyone suggest an easy to configure, secure, imap, email server
> ; o
> > Okay, that bit is easy - if you want to replace your MTA, try Exim or
> > Postfix. They are much easier to configure than sendmail, and at least
> > Postfix has a lot of good documentation to read.
> www.exim.org has more documentation than you could shake a small
> tree at :-)
I think iread
At some point around Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:50:35 +1100, Jeff Waugh said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something along the lines of:
>
> > i want to get rid of sendmail and put in an easier to configure
> > equivelant.
>
>
> Okay, that bit is easy - if you want to replace your MTA, try Exim or
> P
well i'm amazed!
as usual i'm humbled again and again.
of course it's my fault but for the life of me i didn't try this before and
again i've learn't a valuable lesson. it's now working great from the desktop.
i tried to telnet to port 143. var/log/secure gave an error message that imapd
no such
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> the reason for getting rid of sendmail, which has served me well for a few
> years, is because it's not working anymore. ie. i can't connect to the
> email server running sendmail on rh6.2 from either mandrake 6.2 or
> NT.
Is this to _send_ a mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> the reason for getting rid of sendmail, which has served me well for a few
> years, is because it's not working anymore. ie. i can't connect to the
> email server running sendmail on rh6.2 from either mandrake 6.2 or
> NT.
Have you done any ipchains or tcp-wrappers rela
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Rodos wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > i want to get rid of sendmail and put in an easier to configure
> > equivelant.
>
> What is causing you grief with Sendmail? Maybe we can get rid of the
> reason to change? What disto are you using? For some
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i want to get rid of sendmail and put in an easier to configure
> equivelant.
What is causing you grief with Sendmail? Maybe we can get rid of the
reason to change? What disto are you using? For some reason I find
sendmail on my debian machine to b
; i want to get rid of sendmail and put in an easier to configure
; equivelant. i also want to transfer the current emails that are read
; through sendmail.
;
; so, can anyone suggest an easy to configure, secure, imap, email server
; other than sendmail?
http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html
http://www.gl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said something along the lines of:
> i want to get rid of sendmail and put in an easier to configure
> equivelant.
Okay, that bit is easy - if you want to replace your MTA, try Exim or
Postfix. They are much easier to configure than sendmail, and at least
Postfix has a lot of
hi slugs,
i want to get rid of sendmail and put in an easier to configure
equivelant. i also want to transfer the current emails that are read
through sendmail.
so, can anyone suggest an easy to configure, secure, imap, email server
other than sendmail?
also, will this new email server read my
11 matches
Mail list logo
