Re: [SLUG] HTML editors

2002-05-09 Thread Andrew Foster
To throw one more into the pot, check out SciTE: http://www.scintilla.org/SciTE.html Based on the Scintilla code editing component, it's fast, configurable and there's both Win32 and Linux downloads (so you don't need to worry about getting *very* used to it!). Cheers, - Andy Dan Tre

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-10 Thread Steven downing
I almost asked this same question of the list last week. And after searching for 'quanta' i ran across another one. August http://www.lls.se/~johanb/august/ It's not WYSIWYG or anything, but it its a little better than using vim with syntax highlights. Steve -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Gr

RE: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-08 Thread Jon Biddell
On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, you wrote: > wow, you mean there are other editors apart from vi, I had to check for > myself, now pico seems awfully like the dos edit.com program. I think I > will stick to vi myself. No, It's like Wordstar, that venerable DOS WP program that actually WORKED !! -- Reg

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-08 Thread Jon Biddell
> ~/.bashrc: > > alias :q!="exit" > alias :wq="exit" > alias :q="exit" > :-) -- Regards, Jon -- "It is irresponsible to connect a Windows machine to the Internet" ... John Wiltshire (SLUG) -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-08 Thread Jon Biddell
On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, Thom May wrote: > Vim. And possibly gvim for when my eyes are going. syntax > highlighting, and other niceties, plus all the speed power etc > of vi. > These I will look at... > Pico - a real man's editor? only if the man in question is a > severe conniseur of pain... Nah -

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 12:20:49PM +1100, Jill Rowling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Depending on the os/platform, > Text based: > vi, nedit, gvim, notepad (Yup! at the customer's site, or DOS > vi.exe) Sorry I cant resist ;- Whats wrong with "cat" and "sed" combined? cat > blah.html

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Colin Humphreys
TECTED] > > > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Waugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, 8 September 2000 9:23 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors > > > Jamie Honan wrote: > > > > The training in learning a fe

RE: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Jill Rowling
NSW 2018 Phone: (02) 9697-4484 Fax:(02) 9663-1412 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jeff Waugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 8 September 2000 9:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors > Jamie Honan wrote: > > The tra

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Jamie Honan wrote: > > The training in learning a few tags is very minimal. Preach brother. Tags for humans: (optionally: ) (optionally:) (yes, seriously - this is very useful) If really required (ie. coders): Have a look at http://advog

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Jamie Honan
> What are people using for HTML editing ?? Well, if you are starting from a blank sheet: I write technical doco, so YMMV. (i.e. lots of words, few graphics). I write text. Blank line between paras, underline headings like this heading === I then run it through txt2html (a perl script).

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Thom May
ROFLMFAO mind you, i use tcsh with vi keybinds, so i shouldn't comment thom At some point around Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 03:58:50AM +1100, Jeff Waugh spaketh thusly: > > Jon Biddell wrote: > > > > Bloody vi is to Linux what EdLin was to DOS - good for emergencies but > > a pain in the "A" other

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Jon Biddell wrote: > > Bloody vi is to Linux what EdLin was to DOS - good for emergencies but > a pain in the "A" otherwise > > Now - pico - THAT is a real man's editor ~/.bashrc: alias :q!="exit" alias :wq="exit" alias :q="exit" - Jeff -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

RE: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Patrick Kelso
0 1:06 AM > To: Jon Biddell > Cc: Conrad Parker; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors > > > Vim. And possibly gvim for when my eyes are going. syntax > highlighting, and other niceties, plus all the speed power etc > of vi. > > Pico - a real man

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Thom May
Vim. And possibly gvim for when my eyes are going. syntax highlighting, and other niceties, plus all the speed power etc of vi. Pico - a real man's editor? only if the man in question is a severe conniseur of pain... cheers thom At some point around Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:52:56PM +1100, Jon Bid

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Jon Biddell
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Conrad Parker wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:42:15PM +1100, Jon Biddell wrote: > > Gang, > > > > What are people using for HTML editing ?? > > HTML is a computer output format! > > vi is the ultimate in human->computer input! ("the interface is > inside your mind"!) >

Re: [SLUG] HTML Editors

2000-09-07 Thread Conrad Parker
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 09:42:15PM +1100, Jon Biddell wrote: > Gang, > > What are people using for HTML editing ?? HTML is a computer output format! vi is the ultimate in human->computer input! ("the interface is inside your mind"!) you fill in the gaps! K.shouty (ps. I usually use perl to f