RE: [SLUG] OT: wireless security

2004-03-16 Thread Adam W
Grant, > protecting themselves against unwanted traffic. The user must > agree to the > terms of the provider (how that's going to work I don't know > ++) which > includes not deliberately disrupting other users or doing > anything illegal +++. > > ++ I'd like to know as it's a potential se

Re: [SLUG] OT: wireless security

2004-03-16 Thread Grant Parnell
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Edwin Humphries wrote: > I know this is not the reason this list exists, but I know I'm speaking to a > community of largely security conscious IT people. > > What i want to know is what IT security policies are going into place regarding > allowing corporate laptop users t