RE: [SLUG] Welcome to the Movieglobe Mailing List

2003-03-22 Thread Adam W
> > > > Which is a prime example of why the list should be changed to > > "subscribers only can post" - it would LESSEN the workload on our > > overworked list > > admins...:-) > > I disagree - not only is this a bad example of the point, but > changing the list to subscribers-only would not

Re: [SLUG] Welcome to the Movieglobe Mailing List

2003-03-22 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Which is a prime example of why the list should be changed to "subscribers > only can post" - it would LESSEN the workload on our overworked list > admins...:-) I disagree - not only is this a bad example of the point, but changing the list to subscribers-only would not lessen the administrati

RE: [SLUG] Welcome to the Movieglobe Mailing List

2003-03-22 Thread Jon Biddell
=>Wow, neat trick. => =>I've unsubbed the list, and added a couple of mailman =>filters. That's another list manager we're silently ignoring =>mail from. Which is a prime example of why the list should be changed to "subscribers only can post" - it would LESSEN the workload on our overworked li

Re: [SLUG] Welcome to the Movieglobe Mailing List

2003-03-22 Thread Peter Hardy
Hi! On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:33:21 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You have been added to the list. Wow, neat trick. I've unsubbed the list, and added a couple of mailman filters. That's another list manager we're silently ignoring mail from. The amusing and entertaining character(s) who