Hello,
Well, to get the total number that SLURM is aware of, a simple command
would be "sinfo -o %C", which shows Allocated/Idle/Offline/Total CPUs.
Cheers,
Mikael J.
http://www.iki.fi/~mpjohans/
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015, Gene Soudlenkov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to find total numb
Hello there,
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Thompson, Matt[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC] wrote:
However, SLURM is actually allocating for us so that if I ask for
--ntasks=100, I get out a more balanced load:
SLURM_TASKS_PER_NODE=12,11(x8)
So I was wondering: is there a way with salloc/sbat
v 2014 03:34:59 -0800
From: Mikael Johansson
To: slurm-dev
Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: Odd (ReqNodeNotAvail) and (PartitionNodeLimit) with
multiple partitions
Hello All,
Just an update on this, it seems it indeed was just a bug in the old 2.2.7
version of SLURM; after an upgrade to 14.11.0,
as
a documented work-around.
Cheers,
Mikael J.
http://www.iki.fi/~mpjohans/
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Mikael Johansson wrote:
Hello again,
A bit more detail, in case it helps. It seems that the Raw Usage is only
updated based on the longest running job on the system (or perhaps only for
the
user with the new "oldest
job".
Still, any suggestion very much appreciated.
Cheers,
Mikael J.
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Mikael Johansson wrote:
Hello All,
OK, so yesterday we upgraded to 14.11.0. Everything went rather smoothly,
except for one thing: Accounting of Raw Usage see
Hello All,
Just an update on this, it seems it indeed was just a bug in the old 2.2.7
version of SLURM; after an upgrade to 14.11.0, nodes shared by three
partitions do not confuse SLURM anymore.
Cheers,
Mikael J.
http://www.iki.fi/~mpjohans/
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Mikael Johansson
Hello All,
OK, so yesterday we upgraded to 14.11.0. Everything went rather smoothly,
except for one thing: Accounting of Raw Usage seems not to be working
properly.
It works partly, yesterday it seemed to be working for all users, for the
moment only the Raw Usage for one user is updated, w
Mikael Johansson :
Hello All,
We have a power-out soon on our cluster, and I thought now would be a good
opportunity to update SLURM. Just three quick questions to ease my mind:
1. Is an upgrade from version 2.2.7 to 14.03 expected to work "in-place"
without problems, that is, wi
Hello All,
We have a power-out soon on our cluster, and I thought now would be a good
opportunity to update SLURM. Just three quick questions to ease my mind:
1. Is an upgrade from version 2.2.7 to 14.03 expected to work "in-place"
without problems, that is, without loss of the user datab
Hello All,
I had a problem with jobs being stuck in the queue and not being scheduled
even with unused cores on the cluster. The system has four partitions,
three different "high priority" ones and one lower priority, "backfill"
partition. A concise description of the setup in slurm.config,
Thanks!
That looks like something that could be useful indeed. We are for the
moment stuck with version 2.2.7, though, and if I understood the docs
correctly, most of the partition based parameters are of later date and
versions. We might upgrade in some future, though.
It also seems like
ing, but then immediately decreases it when the
jobs start?
Cheers,
Mikael J.
http://www.iki.fi/~mpjohans/
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, je...@schedmd.com wrote:
This should help:
http: //slurm.schedmd.com/preempt.html
Quoting Mikael Johansson :
Hello All,
I've been scratching my he
Hello All,
I've been scratching my head for a while now trying to figure this one
out, which I would think would be a rather common setup.
I would need to set up a partition (or whatever, maybe a partition is
actually not the way to go) with the following properties:
1. If there are any u
13 matches
Mail list logo
