Thanks! That has done the trick for me. I decided to go with
group="messagebus" instead of user="bram".
If this doesn't work for other people, please correct the additions I've
made to the openmoko wiki[1]
Greets,
Bram
[1] http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Debian#Using_dbus_as_a_normal_user
On Fr
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:14:29PM +0100, Bram Neijt wrote:
Hi Bram,
> After having midori tell me I was running as root and that was bad, I
> decided to give it a try. I followed the instructions on the openmoko
> wiki, and now x starts, zhone starts but it seems like I'm not allowed
> to do any
wiki, and now x starts, zhone starts but it seems like I'm not allowed
to do anything with dbus or contact the frameworkd.
My groups are:
bram dialout floppy sudo audio video staff games messagebus
fso does not (yet?) support groups and the current dbus access rights
configuration is set up t
After having midori tell me I was running as root and that was bad, I
decided to give it a try. I followed the instructions on the openmoko
wiki, and now x starts, zhone starts but it seems like I'm not allowed
to do anything with dbus or contact the frameworkd.
My groups are:
bram dialout floppy
Hoi,
I also run a non-root system. It works pretty decent I would say. Only
trouble right now: I have to start remoko as root to connect to my PC.
/A
Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Stefan Monnier writes:
IIUC, this basically means "never". I.e. in order to work reliably, it
should
Stefan Monnier writes:
> IIUC, this basically means "never". I.e. in order to work reliably, it
> should first be made the default, and then bugs will get fixed.
I am running my phone applications as non-root so I am also uncovering bugs :-)
___
Smar
> I think we may make non-root the default as soon as it works reliably.
IIUC, this basically means "never". I.e. in order to work reliably, it
should first be made the default, and then bugs will get fixed.
Stefan
___
Smartphones-userland m
> Dear readers,
>
> I was wondering if running as a normal user is going to be default in
> the future or not. Currently, I'm happy running as root, but the
> perfectionist in me tells me that this isn't right.
>
> Is "upstream", if there is something like that, going to start pushing
> for a secon
Dear readers,
I was wondering if running as a normal user is going to be default in
the future or not. Currently, I'm happy running as root, but the
perfectionist in me tells me that this isn't right.
Is "upstream", if there is something like that, going to start pushing
for a secondary user in t
