SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-07-22 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Hi folks, as we have mentioned quite a number of times, FSO is trying to get out of the distro business, instead we rather want to help projects such as SHR that integrate the FSO components. As such, now that we released milestone 5.5, the fso/milestone5.5 branch is going to be deprecated by us

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-07-23 Thread Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann
Am Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 15:57:43 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > Hi folks, > > as we have mentioned quite a number of times, FSO is trying to get out > of the distro business, instead we rather want to help projects such as > SHR that integrate the FSO components. > > As such, now that we releas

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-07-29 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 19:04, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: > Am Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 15:57:43 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > > > > as we have mentioned quite a number of times, FSO is trying to get out > > of the distro business, instead we rather want to help projects such as > > SHR

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-07-29 Thread Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann
Am Mittwoch 29 Juli 2009 14:00:06 schrieb Stefan Schmidt: > Hello. > > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 19:04, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: > > Am Mittwoch 22 Juli 2009 15:57:43 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > > > as we have mentioned quite a number of times, FSO is trying to get out > > > of the distro b

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-07-30 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 14:15, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: > Am Mittwoch 29 Juli 2009 14:00:06 schrieb Stefan Schmidt: > > > > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 19:04, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: > > > > > > how do we continue now? Base a new branch upon oe.dev and merge in stuff > > > from ms5.5 a

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-01 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Thanks for this proposal, I have nothing more to do add. We should immediately launch 1) to 4) IMO. Lets try to organize it a bit though -- if noone beats me to it, I'm going to take care about the following: recipes/freesmartphone/* recipes/dbus/* recipes/python/* :M:

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-01 Thread Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann
Am Samstag 01 August 2009 12:38:45 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > Thanks for this proposal, I have nothing more to do add. We should > immediately launch 1) to 4) IMO. Lets try to organize it a bit though -- if > noone beats me to it, I'm going to take care about the following: > > recipes/frees

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-01 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
On Saturday 01 August 2009 13:00:38 Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: > Am Samstag 01 August 2009 12:38:45 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > > Thanks for this proposal, I have nothing more to do add. We should > > immediately launch 1) to 4) IMO. Lets try to organize it a bit though -- > > if noone be

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-02 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 12:38, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Thanks for this proposal, I have nothing more to do add. We should > immediately > launch 1) to 4) IMO. Lets try to organize it a bit though -- if noone beats > me > to it, I'm going to take care about the following: > > reci

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-02 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 13:00, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: > Am Samstag 01 August 2009 12:38:45 schrieb Michael 'Mickey' Lauer: > > Thanks for this proposal, I have nothing more to do add. We should > > immediately launch 1) to 4) IMO. Lets try to organize it a bit though -- if > > noone b

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-02 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
On Sunday 02 August 2009 13:53:31 Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 12:38, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > > Thanks for this proposal, I have nothing more to do add. We should > > immediately launch 1) to 4) IMO. Lets try to organize it a bit though -- > > if noone beats me t

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-07 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Current status: recipes/freesmartphone/ [done, but see *] recipes/python/ [done] recipes/vala/ [done] recipes/dbus/* [pending] * I did not push some bogus SECTION changes in python recipes. I also did not push your custom patch against python-ecore, since I'd rather prefer this to be submitted

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-08-08 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Current status: recipes/freesmartphone/ [done, but see *] recipes/python/ [done] recipes/vala/ [done] recipes/dbus/ [done, but see **] * I did not push some bogus SECTION changes in python recipes. I also did not push your custom patch against python-ecore, since I'd rather prefer this to be subm

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-07 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
This task seems to have stalled. I have completed my points. Noone else interested in the merger anymore? :M: ___ Smartphones-userland mailing list Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-us

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-08 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 18:15, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > This task seems to have stalled. I have completed my points. Noone else > interested in the merger anymore? I'm still interested. Sidetracked from uni, vacation, work, etc. Just started a new build and will work through some pr

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-08 Thread Nicola Mfb
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > This task seems to have stalled. I have completed my points. Noone else > interested in the merger anymore? > > :M: Good point, I heard that shr developers are working on testing, I asked why as this is different from the FSO coreteam

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-08 Thread Julien Cassignol
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > The biggest piece that is still missing are the SHR classes, recipes, changes > and fixes. Would be great to get them help from the authors. :) What do you need, exactly? :-) -- Julien Cassignol http://www.ainulindale.net

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-08 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 15:14, Julien Cassignol wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Stefan Schmidt > wrote: > > > The biggest piece that is still missing are the SHR classes, recipes, > > changes > > and fixes. Would be great to get them help from the authors. :) > > What do you need

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-09 Thread Julien Cassignol
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Someone who > > - can tell me if SHR needsa to stay with his own full distro in the future. In the future, yes. It'll stay as is but will improve or merge with other depending on the needs/willingness of other people. I think SHR is good enou

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-10 Thread Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann
Am Mittwoch 09 September 2009 23:45:06 schrieb Julien Cassignol: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > - can tell if moko-autorev is still used. > > I think SHR used it in the past and I should check if it still does. > Anyway mrmoku started maintaining our own versioning stu

Re: [Shr-Devel] SHR FSO OE Branches

2009-09-11 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 18:07, Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann wrote: > Am Mittwoch 09 September 2009 23:45:06 schrieb Julien Cassignol: > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Schmidt > wrote: > > > - can tell if moko-autorev is still used. > > > > I think SHR used it in the past and I should ch