El miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017 20h'09:36 ART, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
escribió:
On 11/02/17 17:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I just reproduced the issue in a VirtualBox install of 14.04 to get these
details. Kernel report in kern.log:
Feb 11 17:16:19 vb1404 kernel: [ 534.781526] tr
Bret,
Can you please guide Xiaoguo with what logs you need for debugging?
Manik
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 4:44 PM, XiaoGuo Liu wrote:
>
> It seems not the problem. My problem is that it cannot finish the last step
> of console-conf after I type the email address. It awaits from the Ubuntu
> Stor
On 7 February 2017 at 09:25, Michael Hudson-Doyle <
michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> I think this makes sense as a way to distribute Go to people who want to
> use Go on their machines. I maintain a PPA with backports of new versions
> of Go to older releases of Ubuntu but it's a bit fiddly
It seems not the problem. My problem is that it cannot finish the last step
of console-conf after I type the email address. It awaits from the Ubuntu
Store, but finally, I received a timeout message.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:14 PM, knitzsche
wrote:
> probably this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.n
jamie,
any insights?
/manik
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 11/02/17 17:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>
>> I just reproduced the issue in a VirtualBox install of 14.04 to get these
>> details. Kernel report in kern.log:
On 11/02/17 17:31, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I just reproduced the issue in a VirtualBox install of 14.04 to get these
details. Kernel report in kern.log:
Feb 11 17:16:19 vb1404 kernel: [ 534.781526] traps: gcc[6209] general
protection ip:7f6632d1b1ee sp:7fff0a09e2f0 error:0 in
libc-2.23.
Just a quick FYI, we now have a Launchpad project for tracking bugs and issues
related to all aspects of the Snap Store:
https://launchpad.net/snapstore
You can also find us in #snappy on Freenode IRC.
And a reminder that there are also:
https://launchpad.net/snapd - for issues specific to s
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Aaron Hampton wrote:
> Thanks. It seems to be the same problem with a missing .desktop file. It
> should exist, though. Any chance you could reject that one, too, and I'll
> look into it further before pushing another update.
Done! Perhaps the .desktop file is not
Thanks. It seems to be the same problem with a missing .desktop file. It
should exist, though. Any chance you could reject that one, too, and I'll
look into it further before pushing another update.
Thanks for all the help,
Aaron
On Feb 15, 2017 4:54 PM, "Daniel Manrique"
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Aaron Hampton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What information do you need? Is the snap ID enough? It is:
> AW8uZ7ZTD6dC6iD1eboxmPyzGxB0pion
Hi Aaron,
I marked your revision 2 as rejected, so the store processed and
approved #3 as we discussed.
Next, #4 got held for manual rev
Hi,
What information do you need? Is the snap ID enough? It is:
AW8uZ7ZTD6dC6iD1eboxmPyzGxB0pion
Thanks again,
Aaron
On Feb 15, 2017 3:25 PM, "Daniel Manrique"
wrote:
> Hello Aaron,
>
> We're looking at ways to make the queueish nature of a snap's upload
> both more visible and more actionable
Hello Aaron,
We're looking at ways to make the queueish nature of a snap's upload
both more visible and more actionable by the developer, since cases
like yours where a snap is rejected and the developer uploads a fixed
version are starting to pop up, and can be easily solved once the
pending uplo
Hi,
Is it possible to remove a revision of an application I uploaded? It
currently has Manual review pending for its status because I failed to
included a .desktop file when one was required. I've since fixed that issue
in subsequent revisions, but their reviews are pending a previous review.
I'd
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:46:21PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote:
> Hola!
>
> To publish stable snaps of different versions at the same time, like Go 1.6
> and 1.7, we now have ‘channel tracks’ in beta.
>
> Each track has its own set of risk-based channels: stable, candidate, beta,
> edge. So fo
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:46:21PM -0300, Facundo Batista wrote:
> Hola!
>
> To publish stable snaps of different versions at the same time, like Go 1.6
> and 1.7, we now have ‘channel tracks’ in beta.
>
> Each track has its own set of risk-based channels: stable, candidate, beta,
> edge. So f
Hola!
To publish stable snaps of different versions at the same time, like Go 1.6 and
1.7, we now have ‘channel tracks’ in beta.
Each track has its own set of risk-based channels: stable, candidate, beta,
edge. So for example, you can choose Go
1.7/stable and 1.7/edge. People who switch to a be
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
> Le 10/02/2017 à 17:30, Simos Xenitellis a écrit :
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
>>> Le 07/02/2017 à 14:05, Simos Xenitellis a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Didier Roche wrote:
> Le 06/02/2017 à 10:
probably this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi2/+bug/1652270
On 02/13/2017 11:04 PM, XiaoGuo Liu wrote:
Today, I had the same problem. I downloaded the Raspberry Pi3 image at:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-core/16/stable/
The date is: ubuntu-core-16-pi3.img.xz
Hi all,
We are using snaps to deliver software to juju deployed units, and we
are hitting a bit of a blocker: upon snap installation, daemons
provided by a snap get unconditionally enabled and (re)started.
I've filed a bug already:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664163
But I wonder what do
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:28:43PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> The ticket to deploy this is (internal link):
>
> https://portal.admin.canonical.com/99787
>
> ... so I expect that this will be rolled out by the time you release
> snapcraft 2.27.
This is now all rolled out, so it'll start worki
20 matches
Mail list logo