On Saturday, June 12, 2004, 10:32:53 PM, Karen wrote:
KP> Hey :)
KP> I played with this a little bit. . .a few things I noticed.
KP> * what's with all the content scanner titles that seem to be
KP> repeats. . . (ie. type in Vopmail. . .look at #8 it says
KP> SortMonster - Message Sniffer
Pete,
I've been seeing a good deal of Experimental hits on bounce messages,
primarily with the Nazi spam that has been forging recipients, but I've
seen these on other messages that seemingly don't have any spam content,
though most of course do involve spam.
I was wondering if this is due to I
On Sunday, June 13, 2004, 11:49:21 PM, Matt wrote:
M> Pete,
M> I've been seeing a good deal of Experimental hits on bounce messages,
M> primarily with the Nazi spam that has been forging recipients, but I've
M> seen these on other messages that seemingly don't have any spam content,
M> though mos
Pete,
So would the Message-ID produce a hit if it was in the body of a
message? The reason why I ask is because I'm concerned about the
possibility of legitimate servers getting tagged with Experimental and
how that plays into my system.
Am I also to assume that you have some protections in pl
On Monday, June 14, 2004, 12:33:24 AM, Matt wrote:
M> Pete,
M> So would the Message-ID produce a hit if it was in the body of a
M> message? The reason why I ask is because I'm concerned about the
M> possibility of legitimate servers getting tagged with Experimental and
M> how that plays into m
Pete,
I've seen a moderate number of these bounces in the last few days
tagged by Experimental that didn't have any obvious indications of
spam. You are of course correct that a majority of bounces are the
result of viruses or Joe-Jobs. Fortunately the Joe-Jobs are mostly
returned to non-exi
