[sniffer] Increase in FPs

Title: Increase in FPs I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives today. I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address. Has there been a big change in the core rulebase today? I wouldn't think that upgrading to the new code this morning would cause this, would it? Bill

Re: [sniffer] Increase in FPs

On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 2:06:22 AM, Landry wrote: LW I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives LW today.  I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address.  Has LW there been a big change in the core rulebase today?  I wouldn't LW think that upgrading to the new

RE: [sniffer] Increase in FPs

-Original Message- From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] LW I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives today.  LW I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address.  Has there been LW a big change in the core rulebase today?  I wouldn't think that LW upgrading to

Re: [sniffer] Increase in FPs

Pete, What about the Spam that seems to have been slipping through recently? I have submitted half a dozen or so in the last 24 hours and I am still getting copies. I also loaded the new version of sniffer yesterday but that did not change anything. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech II CCNA Nez

Re[2]: [sniffer] Increase in FPs

On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 11:29:19 AM, Jim wrote: JM Pete, JM What about the Spam that seems to have been slipping through recently? I JM have submitted half a dozen or so in the last 24 hours and I am still JM getting copies. I also loaded the new version of sniffer yesterday but that

[sniffer] Spam Leakage - last 2-3 weeks.

Hello Sniffer, I think we've identified the cause of some reports of spam leakage over the past few weeks. I've been testing submitted messages against customer rulebases and I've noted that in almost every case there were rules that matched the messages. One of the customers

Re: [sniffer] Spam Leakage - last 2-3 weeks. - topic change

_M: I recommend that you review your weights using a combination of your current experiences and the spam test quality analysis found here: http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html Is the code to make these graphs avail? I saw a thread before about this before but do not recall the

[sniffer] Sniffer setup

Hello, I'm setting sniffer on a redhat 9 machine, i just started the setup and i'm getting this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source]# useradd -g 93 -u 93 -c Spam Filter -d /bin/false -s /bin/false snfilter bash: useradd: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTED] Source]# chown snfilter /var/spool/snfilter

Re: [sniffer] Sniffer setup

Are you sure the useradd executable is in the directory you are running the script from. bash: useradd: command not found I would think would simply indicate that either useradd is not in the directory, or maybe it is not set executable. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech II CCNA Nez Perce Tribe

Re: [sniffer] Sniffer setup

oh, never mind, i figured it out,, can't be done via telnet,, i logged in ssh, and it worked fine:-) -Ken - Original Message - From: Ken Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:05 PM Subject: [sniffer] Sniffer setup Hello, I'm setting