RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Title: Message Never mind, I reread your original post and then checked my server and already had them installed. Now I just wait for the next update to occur. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 2:31:18 AM, Landry wrote: snip/ LW 2) I personally find it to be a bit messy to have everything LW running from within my Sniffer directory.  After all of the LW other CMD files, old rulebases, service related files, logs, LW etc., it's not obvious what

Re: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread Matt
Since Pete replied to Bill's response and he also modified his stance on one item, I figured I would just piece my thoughts below. Pete McNeil wrote: On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 2:31:18 AM, Landry wrote: snip/ MB 2) I personally find it to be a bit messy to have everything MB running

RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Title: Message Seems to have worked good so far. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:30 AM To:

RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread Woody G Fussell
Bill This would apply to Imail users. I suggest that rather than creating two aliases that you use only a program alias. Trigger it using an inbound Imail subject rule to send a copy to the alias. Everyone has a unique subject line based on your rule base ID therefore you can create a unique

RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread Landry William
There are many ways to skin this cat. For Declude JunkMail Pro users, you could also setup a COPYTO action to notify the program alias. However, the dual alias setup appeared to be the simplest way for the novice mail admin to get this working. More experienced admins will have the ability to

RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread Woody G Fussell
I agree on the simplicity, just thought it would be a bonus not to involve sortmonster with the address changes. Woody -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Landry William Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 2:37 PM To: 'sniffer@SortMonster.com'

RE: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread Landry William
Documenting and troubleshooting rule creation/configuration I think would only add to the complexity. Also, many admins do not host their corporate domains on IMail. For example, SortMonster was sending my update notifications to my corporate Exchange server, so I had to request a change

Re[2]: [sniffer] Triggered rulebase update instructions

2004-12-29 Thread Pete McNeil
On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, 3:45:43 PM, Landry wrote: LW Documenting and troubleshooting rule creation/configuration I think would LW only add to the complexity. Also, many admins do not host their corporate LW domains on IMail. For example, SortMonster was sending my update LW