I am finding that most if not all email from Comcast senders are failing
Sniffer.
Fred
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Pete,
Can you send these kinds of emails to Hamed instead of me please.
thanks
Judy Burnett
Everyones Internet, Ltd.
835 Greens Parkway, Suite 150
Houston, TX 77067
713-579-2802
Fax: 713-942-8621
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNei
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 9:35:59 AM, Frederick wrote:
FS> I am finding that most if not all email from Comcast senders are failing
FS> Sniffer.
Please submit a false positive report to false@ and include matching
SNF log entries if possible.
Thanks,
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sni
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 9:37:29 AM, Judy wrote:
JB> Pete,
JB> Can you send these kinds of emails to Hamed instead of me please.
JB> thanks
I have changed your subscription.
Please note you can alter your sniffer@ list subscription at any time.
Information is on our help page:
http://www.sort
Hello Sniffer Folks,
A rule was created today by one of the robots which targets
.comcast.net -- This happened when a number of blacklists including
SBL listed comcast IPs causing the robot to be convinced that a
message in the spamtrap warranted tagging the domain.
The rule has been re
Whew! Just got done forwarding 90 false positives to mail clients. Sure
glad you caught it!
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:27 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net
Hello Sniffer
Comcast messages still getting caught. Even after adding the panic rule.
Even this mail from the list got caught. Can you update my rulebase?
Thank you,
Mike Stein
- Original Message -
From: "Computer House Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 11:57 AM
Subj
Thanks for the quick work, Pete.
I put in the Rule-panic entry as soon as you sent the email to this
list.
For what it's worth, I just finished with all my held mail for the last
two days, and I had no false positives from messages with a mailfrom
that included "c o m c a s t".
Lots of mail that
Pete,
Is this in the "beta"/"free" release of Sniffer rules?
Erik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 6:20 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comcast.net
Thanks f
Warning!
When you add a RulePanic entry and are running Sniffer in persistent
mode, you have to restart the service for it to take effect. I changed
this earlier and it had no effect until I restarted the service on my
box. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but just changing my config file had
no e
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 12:12:40 PM, Computer wrote:
CHS> Comcast messages still getting caught. Even after adding the panic rule.
CHS> Even this mail from the list got caught. Can you update my rulebase?
Hmmm... Be sure the format is correct and that it is not commented
out.
All rulebases a
Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in
place. Any suggestions?
Mike Stein
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 12:31:18 PM, Erik wrote:
E> Pete,
E> Is this in the "beta"/"free" release of Sniffer rules?
It may not be --- it's new enough that it may have been excluded from
the demo rulebase. To make sure you should make a quick scan of your
SNF log file for that rule number. In an
See my message below...restart your Sniffer service and it should work.
Matt
Computer House Support wrote:
Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in
place. Any suggestions?
Mike Stein
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)s
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 12:45:53 PM, Computer wrote:
CHS> Mail from Comcast is still getting caught, even with the panic rule in
CHS> place. Any suggestions?
* be sure you have updated .cfg
* be sure your entry is in the correct format. You will find examples
at the bottom of your .cfg file w
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 12:41:42 PM, Matt wrote:
M> Warning!
M> When you add a RulePanic entry and are running Sniffer in persistent
M> mode, you have to restart the service for it to take effect.
You can also issue ".exe reload"
M> Pete, when you send out these notifications, would you ple
Matt,
Restarting the sniffer service seems to have done the trick. Thank you for
the suggestion!
Michael Stein
Computer House
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Rule 353039 - .comca
Pete,
My config file was completely unedited, i.e. every setting was commented
out. I verified that one and a half hours after the config change this
rule was still hitting until I had restarted the service. Maybe there
is a bug in the persistent engine reloading the config without
interventi
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 1:03:18 PM, Matt wrote:
M> Pete,
M> My config file was completely unedited, i.e. every setting was commented
M> out. I verified that one and a half hours after the config change this
M> rule was still hitting until I had restarted the service. Maybe there
M> is a bug i
19 matches
Mail list logo
