I haven't had an update since 8:45am PST. Usually I'll have 3 or 4
updates in this period. Anything going on?
Thanks
Kevin
On 2/5/2010 11:44 AM, Pete McNeil wrote:
Hi Sniffer Folks,
After more back-end improvements and some careful analysis we have
increased our rulebase update rate by
I sent a message earlier to this list but I'm not sure if it went
through. We've been hit by this Appriver issue and it is still going on
as far as I can tell. One of our users, call him [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sent a message to about 70 people. And this message has been bounced 20
or 30,000
Pete - Thanks for the reply, but I guess I don't understand what you're
saying. Some packet loss and rulebase downloads to slow down for a
time don't reflect what happened to me yesterday and apparently not
what happened to one of the other posters either when he said that
Appriver was having
So when I asked how I would send in false positives, someone mentioned
that I should look up the appropriate log entry and send that in. That
brings up another question. My log file is 270MB and climbing. I've
never opened it cause it's too big. Do you have a reader for your log
files?
I
My users have been getting a lot of FPs by Sniffer lately. They send me
the email with the FULL HEADERS displayed and I forward this email on to
SortMonster. The program they use to analyze incoming submissions check
MY email headers, determine that SNIFFER was not at fault and sends me
back
And do we just tell you what email address we're using and give you
account login and password?
Thanks for you help
Kevin Rogers
support wrote:
Dear Pete,
Are we ready to switch to the POP method of submitting spam, or are we
waiting for an official announcement/instructions from you
Sorry - I was talking about false positives. I assume we need to send
false positives to the false@ address.
Can my users send you these messages directly?
Or do they need to forward them to me first (as the registered user)?
And if they do need to forward false positives to me first, is it
