RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-13 Thread Pete McNeil
ement --     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michiel Prins Sent: donderdag 8 april 2004 21:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 Preliminary tests show there's no I/O problem but I'll do some addition

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-13 Thread Michiel Prins
Behalf Of Michiel PrinsSent: donderdag 8 april 2004 21:11To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 Preliminary tests show there's no I/O problem but I'll do some additional benchmarking here and get back to you on this.   Groet

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-08 Thread Kirk Mitchell
At 05:42 AM 4/8/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote: > http://www.keyconn.net/misc/sniffer.htm > > I'll bet you are using b1 - this first 2-3beta does not implement the >command interface. Yes, I had b1 in use, trying b2 now. -- Kirk Mitchell-General Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] Keystone Connect

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-08 Thread Michiel Prins
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeilSent: woensdag 7 april 2004 17:38To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail/NT4 test platform (severely underpowered)...snf2beta 2004

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-08 Thread Pete McNeil
At 12:03 PM 4/8/2004, you wrote: Final Beta looking good here. But followed instructions (used FireDaemon to handle as a service) and everything "seems" ok. Nothing strange in logs. The only readily apparent difference is in the sniffer log, where the 4th column of data, which is usually a numb

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-08 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Final Beta looking good here. Imail 8.1 HF1 Haven't invested any time to confirm that persistence is working, or that it helps. Haven't invested any time to learn how to read the sniffer logs either (since everything is working like a charm). But followed instructions (used FireDaemon to handle

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-08 Thread Pete McNeil
At 05:42 AM 4/8/2004, you wrote: AHere's a screen shot of what should happen. Behind the scenes when you run sniffer stop, a sniffer.stop file is created in the workspace. The persistent server looks for Sorry to respond to my own post - There are a number of type-os in the help message. For exam

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Kirk Mitchell
At 10:23 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote: > >> >>Tried the above and got an error message. Tried: >>sniffer.exe xxauthenticationxx stop >>and it paused a few seconds and returned to command prompt, so I'm guessing >>that it stopped. > >That doesn't sound quite right. > >In the distribution ther

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
At 10:25 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: Since you're up, sorry to ask, where's the beta? Didn't save the e-mail. Rob http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Betas/ _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonst

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
At 09:39 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: > My findings are that persistent is offering great benefits, havnt tried an excessively harsh test yet, but i'm about to do that. Just ran sniffer in both persistent and non-persistent modes with over 1,000 mesages in the overflow and MaxQueProc at 50. This pegs

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Since you're up, sorry to ask, where's the beta? Didn't save the e-mail. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 9:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
Tried the above and got an error message. Tried: sniffer.exe xxauthenticationxx stop and it paused a few seconds and returned to command prompt, so I'm guessing that it stopped. That doesn't sound quite right. In the distribution there are some .CMD files that show examples of the commands: st

Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Frederick Samarelli
This worked great. Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:46 PM Subject: Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 > At 08:36 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: > >What is t

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Kirk Mitchell
At 09:11 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote: > >sniffer.exe stop - will stop the persistent server by sending it a message >file. > >Run 'sniffer.exe stop' at the command line and your persistent instance >will exit cleanly on it's own. [ replace sniffer.exe with the name of your >executable of

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
> My findings are that persistent is offering great benefits, havnt tried an > excessively harsh test yet, but i'm about to do that. Just ran sniffer in both persistent and non-persistent modes with over 1,000 mesages in the overflow and MaxQueProc at 50. This pegs out my CPU between 90% & 100%

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
>Sniffer is adaptive. You can turn the persistent instance on and off at >will. Simply stop the service - a reboot is not needed. If the persistent >instance is turned off then the remaining instances will organize >themselves in the usual way. I don't have it running as a service, I started the

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Kirk Mitchell
At 08:30 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote: >This doesn't make any sense. I have no good theory for this. I am unable to >create any scenario where using the persistent engine degrades performance. >In all of my tests on three separate platforms the persistent engine >produces a significant imp

Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
At 08:36 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: What is the best and proper way to setup Persistent mode on a windows 2000 computer and run as a service. Fred * Make a backup copy of your current executable (just in case). * Rename the 2-3b2 executable for your license and replace your current executable. At th

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
>>Pre-beta >>20040304211333 d9bec001201263026.smd 312 0 Match 89089 >20040304211333 d9bec001201263026.smd 312 0 Final 89089 >>Persistant sniffer >>20040407042039 d819316c90154969c.smd 100032 Match 94972 >>20040407042039 d819316c90154969c.smd 1000

Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Frederick Samarelli
What is the best and proper way to setup Persistent mode on a windows 2000 computer and run as a service. Fred - Original Message - From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:30 PM Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
Pre-persistant sniffer my times sometimes got high, but never beyond 3 digits. While running the persistant beta, about half of my times are in the thousands. The machine also seems to be far more prone to bogging down under a mail load. This is on a P2/800mhz 1g ram machine. Pre-beta 2004030421

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Kirk Mitchell
At 05:35 PM 4/7/04 -0400, Pete McNeil wrote: > Yes... that seems about right. When a persistent server is running the >rulebase is almost never reloaded. Only two significant things happen >during the setup time as measured by Sniffer: 1) Loading the rulebase, 2) >locating a job to process (directo

Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Matt
PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: So, making sure I'm following your analysis: I'm looking at my log file and I'm seeing lines similar to   snf2beta 20040407020014 D60a4134.SMD 181

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
    20040407041123  D7f6a73760202cc6f.SMD   0   16  Final   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: So, making

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Tom Baker | Netsmith Inc
, April 07, 2004 4:36 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: So, making sure I'm following your analysis: I'm looking at my log file and I'm seeing lines similar to snf2beta 20040407020014 D60a4134.SMD 181 30 Mat

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
At 04:06 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: So, making sure I'm following your analysis: I'm looking at my log file and I'm seeing lines similar to   snf2beta 20040407020014 D60a4134.SMD 181 30 Match 101576 58 20 38 68 And that 181 figure seems to hold pretty stable. 181 is substantially lower than the valu

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread John Shacklett
11:38 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail/NT4 test platform (severely underpowered)...snf2beta 20040407140913 D0b86122.SMD 30 90 Final 75148 63 0 6891 68snf2beta 20040407140913 D0b8614e.SMD 90 140 Fi

Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
twork Security   -  Internet  -   E-mail Software Development -  Project Management ------     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: woensdag 7 april 2004 11:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sniffer]

Re: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Frederick Samarelli
What do the number after the Final/Clean indicate. - Original Message - From: Pete McNeil To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:38 AM Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 Extraordinary...Compare with a snippet from our IMail

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
-------     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: woensdag 7 april 2004 11:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 What does the sniffer log show during this time? _M At 04:48 AM 4/

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Michiel Prins
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeilSent: woensdag 7 april 2004 11:21To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3 What does the sniffer log show during this time?_MAt 04:48 AM 4/7/2004, you wrote: Pete,Despite my suggestions with less polling time,

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Pete McNeil
What does the sniffer log show during this time? _M At 04:48 AM 4/7/2004, you wrote: Pete, Despite my suggestions with less polling time, I can't seem to get the persistent version to speed up my message processing. I've copied part of my custom log file below. Bold numbers are the amount of ms i

RE: [sniffer] Final beta (b2) for snfrv2r3

2004-04-07 Thread Michiel Prins
Pete,Despite my suggestions with less polling time, I can't seem to get the persistent version to speed up my message processing. I've copied part of my custom log file below. Bold numbers are the amount of ms it takes to execute sniffer (timed by an external program that executes it). Persi