RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

the status of each download attempt, as it is created (overwriting the existing file) with each download attempt. Bill -Original Message- From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 6:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re[2]: [sniffer]

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

Message - From: "Landry William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 7:29 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you? > > Aren't you using the compression option to gzip your files before >

Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

On Wednesday, October 27, 2004, 10:07:59 AM, Jorge wrote: >>This will continue to grow I'm afraid --- though later versions will >>deal with the file directly at some point. All of the rules that are >>included in the rulebase file are live patterns that have seen recent >>activity. The system aut

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

stice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you? Do we have a timetable for this new release Sorry cant afford time to beta test! I do get alarmed at the huge .snf file at around 14

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 3:29 PM To: Glenn Brooks Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you? On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 11:03:45 AM, Glenn wrote: GB> can you send the link to this again <http://www.sortmonst

Re[2]: [sniffer] 2-3.0i9 looks good to me... How about you?

On Tuesday, October 26, 2004, 11:03:45 AM, Glenn wrote: GB> can you send the link to this again There you go, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subsc