Boeing has a similar sensitivity about the Jumbo and the bulge (gallery?) on
top at the front is a legally protected design feature. I think someone
produced a PSS version a few years ago and got into a similar fight.
I believe that these companies try to protect their trademarks in what seems
-
From: Terry Mickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 6:23 PM
To: Bushell, Jeremy
Subject: Spar Design Spreadsheet
Hi Jeremy.
Would you mind sending me a copy of Lee's spar size spreadsheet? I
downloaded one from a
web site mentioned on RCSE but it appears
>>I'm building a two meter plane which provides at least a reasonable
wingspan concerning visibility, however, I need this plane to be viewable
by individuals with impaired vision. What colors/color scheme would be
suggested? I need the best possible for this demonstration to be a
success.
View
>I have been playing with wing planforms lately
>and now I want to discuss this with other people.
Have you tried Liftroll?
http://www.geocities.com/jebbushell/COOKBOOK.htm
There is also an article in the current issue of Model Aviation.
Jeb Bushell.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Air
Important disclaimer: I know nothing.
But, if 2 oz of ballast was necessary to be competitive in a recent windy
HLG contest, and atlatls are potentially so effective, couldn't a small
atlatl be attached as a ballast option? It would be part of the aircraft
and therefore legal.
Jeb Bushell
Newto
5 matches
Mail list logo