--- Art Mcnamee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some are afraid to fly the RG15 as they say it won't thermal. They
are wrong.
Yep. RG15 is a great thermal airfoil. In fact, an RG15-equipped Pike
won the F3J WC if I remember right.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
---
GG
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:29:38
Art Mcnamee wrote:
Some are afraid to fly the RG15 as they say it won't thermal. They are wrong.
The RG15 will range, go fast and will thermal.
Art is right! Does anyone remember the Airtronics/Mark Allen Thermal Eagle? Not a
bad plane plane to say
You wrote:
You are comparing apples to oranges. The ONLY way to get true comparison
to the overall performance of the two
airfoils would be to fly two identical planes with only the airfoil
being different. Even then it would be only for that planform, that
wing loading, that set of weather
.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] 7037 vs. MH32 Discussion plus 7035 and others
In a message dated 12/16/01 12:36:33 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
That Joe guy has
I'd be interested in a discussion regarding the merits of the 7037 vs. the
MH32. They look quite different to me. Isn't this a real big choice?
To me the MH32 looks like more of a sloping foil while the 7037 looks like a
floaty thermaling foil.
I have to confess a personal bias. When I tried
Subject: [RCSE] 7037 vs. MH32 Discussion
I'd be interested in a discussion regarding the merits of the 7037 vs. the
MH32. They look quite different to me. Isn't this a real big choice?
To me the MH32 looks like more of a sloping foil while the 7037 looks like
a
floaty thermaling foil.
I have
OK. You guys wanted airfoil discussion and I'm in the mood for discussing,
seeing as its Friday night and I've had my quota of brown bottles for the
next couple of weeks (that's two - for those who don't know me).
I have flown both of these airfoils, the 7037 rather extensively and the
MH32
7 matches
Mail list logo
