[RCSE] JR R610M receiver

2002-11-06 Thread yclui_hk
Hello, I am planning to order the JR 610M receiver for my new sailplanes and wonder if anyone can share his related experience with me, good or bad. Thanks, Y C Lui RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ple

Re: [RCSE] JR R610M receiver

2000-11-23 Thread mikel
If you're looking for an interesting RX to try, check out the new R700 FM receiver. I've had one of the test ones in my PicoJet all year. Smaller than the 549's and only .64 oz with the case. The web site shows the 610M as in stock. There is no mention of the short antenna that was on the origi

Re: [RCSE] JR R610M receiver

2000-11-23 Thread Joe Hahn
I had a similar, but a bit less detailed account of the 610 from JR, thanks Bob for the detailed info. They basically acknowledged to me that there was indeed a problem, and that the next run of receivers(probably available by now) will incorporate changes which will fix the problem. The blue dot

Re: [RCSE] JR R610M receiver

2000-11-23 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen
I have recently installed what I was told is the updated version of this RX in a Piccolo. It was just shipped direct from JR. It is working properly. I have removed the OEM antenna (it is now supplied with a regular length antenna) and repalced it with a based-loaded whip. A rigorous range-check s

Re: [RCSE] JR R610M receiver

2000-11-22 Thread Rcsoar4fun
In a message dated 11/22/00 4:43:52 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << JR technicians had told us they stopped production, and had no idea when/if the problems would be fixed, and if they would be produced again. >> I had heard the same thing, but my father recently

Re: Re: [RCSE] JR R610M receiver

2000-11-22 Thread Robert (Bob) P. Andris
good job Horizon. Bob > >Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 17:42:05 EST >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR R610M receiver >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ><<environment? Thoughts anyone? >Thanks, >Ed Franz>&