>At High CL it strikes me that the laminar flow (if any) would be on the
bottom
>surface.
I'm confused. Laminar as apposed to turbulent? Detached apposed to attached?
I'd think you'd want both attached and laminar.
I don't think I'm following your question.
Bill Swingle
RCSE-List facilities pr
In my search for a higher lift airfoil I'm looking at the DAE-51
I will be using it at a CL of around 1
At High CL it strikes me that the laminar flow (if any) would be on the bottom
surface. The wing is going to be built up with a wide rib spacing for
Solar Cells.
Would I find any benefit from m
2 matches
Mail list logo
