Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-07-02 Thread Jack Strother
I would Agree, A Special Thanks to Ed Franz And Sheldon. Most folks do not Know the Grief That some people put upon the registrar, Thanks Ed and Sheldon CJ At 07:24 AM 6/28/2005, Marc Gellart wrote: A thanks to all that have entered the 2005 AMA National Soaring Championship. Tom Kallevang

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-30 Thread rdwoebke
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Lachowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Friends don't let friends fly 2M. Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you entering F3b at next years Nats. What!!?? 2 Meters suck? I just spent like 8 months building one! I

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-30 Thread James V. Bacus
I always know you are smiling, dude... 8-) At 03:47 PM 6/29/2005, rdwoebke wrote: :-) Smiley added for Jim and other's benefit! Jim Downers Grove, IL Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net RCSE-List facilities

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-29 Thread Jack Strother
This is kool Stuff.. Thanks !! 2-M can go as far as I am concerned as well.. At 02:58 PM 6/28/2005, Steve Meyer wrote: Taking the latest published registration information at http://www.silentflight.org/NATS2005/Register.html I have compiled the following. 3 pilots are registered

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good This is kool Stuff.. Thanks !! 2-M can go as far as I am concerned as well.. At 02:58 PM 6/28/2005, Steve Meyer wrote: Taking the latest published registration information at http://www.silentflight.org/NATS2005/Register.html I have compiled the following. 3

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Chuck Anderson
At 10:18 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: Yup, I agree! We should get rid of all classes that might take some real talent and skill to fly well in. Justin 2-meter doesn't take any more talent than unlimited or standard class. Just better vision. Chuck Anderson RCSE-List facilities provided by

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
PROTECTED]; Soaring@airage.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 4:16 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good This is kool Stuff.. Thanks !! 2-M can go as far as I am concerned as well.. Jim Downers Grove, IL Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV R/C

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
I know that Chuck. :^) But many will disagree. Justin - Original Message - From: Chuck Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: soaring@airage.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:51 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter At 10:18 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: Yup, I agree

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
get rid of all classes that might take some real talent and skill to fly well in. Justin - Original Message - From: Jack Strother [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Soaring@airage.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 4:16 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
Everything but NOS...It's real easy to check. http://www.silentflight.org/NATS2005/Register.html Justin Ammon - Original Message - From: James V. Bacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: soaring@airage.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2

Re: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Pat McCleave
@airage.com Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter He is entered and flying in it, are you? I guess you are entered for 2005, I don't see your name in the scores from 2004... I guess we will see you demonstrate your 2m skills in Muncie in a few weeks, I can't wait. 8

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
. Justin (btw, the res thing is a joke) - Original Message - From: James V. Bacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: soaring@airage.com Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:58 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter He is entered and flying in it, are you? I guess you

Re: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
. See Ya, Pat (wishing I was going to the Nats) McCleave From: James V. Bacus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2005/06/29 Wed AM 11:58:58 EDT To: soaring@airage.com Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter He is entered and flying in it, are you? I guess you are entered

Re: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good - Good-bye 2M

2005-06-29 Thread Steve Meyer
Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good This is kool Stuff.. Thanks !! 2-M can go as far as I am concerned as well.. Jim Downers Grove, IL Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net RCSE-List facilities provided

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Michael Lachowski
Friends don't let friends fly 2M. Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you entering F3b at next years Nats. I know Chuck won't be at any of those F.. class events. ;-) RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and unsubscribe

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Justin Ammon
29, 2005 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter Friends don't let friends fly 2M. Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you entering F3b at next years Nats. I know Chuck won't be at any of those F.. class events. ;-) RCSE

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Cal Posthuma
, June 29, 2005 1:47 PM Subject: Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter Friends don't let friends fly 2M. Anyway, if you want classes that require real skill, I look forward to you entering F3b at next years Nats. I know Chuck won't be at any of those F.. class events. ;-) RCSE

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Anker Berg-Sonne
Friends don't let friends discuss already out-discussed topics on RCSE. This belongs with down-wind turns, counter-clockwise thermals, etc. Anker RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Chuck Anderson
At 11:57 AM 6/29/2005, you wrote: Friends don't let friends discuss already out-discussed topics on RCSE. This belongs with down-wind turns, counter-clockwise thermals, etc. Anker But dynamic soaring is downwind turns. Don't discuss that either? :-) Chuck Anderson RCSE-List facilities

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
At 11:14 AM 6/29/2005, Justin Ammon wrote: Jim, Don't hold your breath for any special show of talent, but I do enjoy flying all of the classes...Well...Except for maybe RES, but I guess I can catch up on some sleep during the flights... None the less, now I am looking forward to meeting

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread Daryl Perkins
(I travel to a lot of contests, I've contested in AZ before). JB - Wasn't it you that got an actual measured 0 on an AMA tape in AZ? If it wasn't you... who the heck was that? That cracked me up... ;-) D __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo!

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-29 Thread Marc Gellart
Couldn't see paying that much for three flights plus another night in the motel. We flew four rounds last yerar of each RES and NOS if I remember right and that was after a bit of a late start. . I am through flying Nostalgia class until we start flying Nostalgia tasks just like we flew

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good-Death to 2-meter

2005-06-29 Thread James V. Bacus
Heh heh heh... ya, your memory is excellent... (Q: What's worse than having a close zero landing? A: Having DP confirm it for you.) At 06:28 PM 6/29/2005, you wrote: (I travel to a lot of contests, I've contested in AZ before). JB - Wasn't it you that got an actual measured 0 on an AMA

[RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread Marc Gellart
A thanks to all that have entered the 2005 AMA National Soaring Championship. Tom Kallevang posted the final stats on the LSF website, www.silentflight.org , and the numbers are good considering the change in schedule that has been instituted by AMA. The total entries are 408, a bit down from

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread Steve Meyer
Taking the latest published registration information at http://www.silentflight.org/NATS2005/Register.html I have compiled the following. 3 pilots are registered exclusively for HLG - 10.3% 2 pilots are registered exclusively for F3J - 4.3% 2 pilots are registered exclusively for 2M - 2.2% 16

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread Dana Flemming
Good Lord, I wish I had this kind of time... ;-) Dana Steve Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Taking the latest published registration information at I have compiled the following.3 pilots are registered exclusively for HLG - 10.3%2 pilots are registered exclusively for F3J - 4.3%2 pilots are

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread Chuck Anderson
Entries look good. Wonder how many 2-meter entries you would have had if it were scheduled after Unlimited. I entered 2-meter every year until 1998. Couldn't see the smaller models well enough after my eye surgery. This is the first year I have not entered Nostalgia and RES since they have

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread Dan Borer
Boy Chuck, I know you have a few years under the belt, but I didn't know you were that old! Dan - Original Message - From: Chuck Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am through flying Nostalgia class until we start flying Nostalgia tasks just like we flew before 1908. Chuck Anderson

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread Chuck Anderson
Sometimes I feel that old. Should have been 1980. :-) And I have flown in every soaring Nats since 1974 except when my job interfered. Haven't missed one since I retired in 1994. Chuck Anderson At 04:56 PM 6/28/2005, you wrote: Boy Chuck, I know you have a few years under the belt, but I

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread Michael Lachowski
2M still exists :-( Busy finishing up another 2M for the Nats. I sold my old one at last years Nats hoping that the schedule might not have 2 days of 2M in the middle. Steve Meyer wrote: Taking the latest published registration information at

Re: [RCSE] NATS Entries Look Good

2005-06-28 Thread AMA3655
...and I wish I had that kind of analytical capability, and the time thing too, and maybe I should practice landings but no, I'm gonna spend a week and a half in Bavaria drinking beer and visiting castles, monasteries, museums, and breweries. See Y'all at the Nats. I'll be entered in