Re: [RCSE] Re:JR Scan Select receiver feedback

2006-07-09 Thread GordySoar
I have been looking at them in the magazines and on line for about three months now and they seem to look just fine.  I haven't tried to look at them with my antenna down, or while holding a plane but I can tell you that with my new distance optimized sunglasses I can see the ad's really far

Re: [RCSE] Re:JR Scan Select receiver feedback

2006-07-09 Thread Bill's Email
Can anyone tell me the relationship between antenna down ground range and antenna up airborne performance?? What exactly is the mathematical relationship?? If this is real, then it should be able to be written in a formula. No other radio device that I know of "tests" its performance by takin

Re: [RCSE] Re:JR Scan Select receiver feedback

2006-07-09 Thread Chuck Anderson
At 01:43 PM 7/9/2006, you wrote: Got one a week or so ago and the range check was about 1/2 that of a Hitec Super Slim in identical setups. Now I am in a quandry as I don't know whether the Hitec is that good or do I have a defective JR. It's been a few months but as I recall I got similar res

[RCSE] Re:JR Scan Select receiver feedback

2006-07-09 Thread Thomas Finch
Got one a week or so ago and the range check was about 1/2 that of a Hitec Super Slim in identical setups. Now I am in a quandry as I don't know whether the Hitec is that good or do I have a defective JR. It's been a few months but as I recall I got similar results comparing a Shadow 3 to the Hi