Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Jeff Reid
>Coordinated flight produces the minimum drag flight condition. >How you get it is not all that important. Wouldn't minimal surface deflections, a combination of ailerons, flaps, rudder, and possibly elevator, reduce drag during a roll? RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Se

Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Bill Malvey
On 7/9/01 9:43 PM, "Jeff Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand this, but instead of eliminating the adverse yaw with a > lot of aileron differential and no rudder compensation. You've lost me. You seem to want this to be more complicated than it really is. Adverse yaw is prim

Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Jeff Reid
> balance the lift and drag on both wings Forgot to mention, aileron differential can balance drag, but only for a limited range of airspeed. Again, I assume that the goal is efficient thermal turns (not high speed turns), so this speed range limitation is not much of an issue. F3B gliders have

Re: [RCSE] Why not aileron->elevator mix?

2001-07-10 Thread Jeff Reid
{sorry, posted without entering proper subject, reposting with text cleaned up} > > Differential aileron and rudder coupling are used to limit the effects > > of adverse yaw, NOT a pitching moment. > Actually, I think what he was implying is that the aileron differntial > that's used to counte