Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Chris Babcock wrote:
>
>> I have also seen similar behavior with devices that do auto MDI<->MDIX
>> setting with some devices. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if there is a
>> way to control the MDI/MDIX function in software. Anybody, here know
>> if there is a way to contro
Chris Babcock wrote:
> I have also seen similar behavior with devices that do auto MDI<->MDIX
> setting with some devices. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if there is a
> way to control the MDI/MDIX function in software. Anybody, here know if
> there is a way to control that in software?
auto md
On 2008-06-11, Chuck (Doc) Beaudette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I replaced the 4801 with a new 5501, the throughput between the Cisco
> 2640 and the Soekris router dropped to next to nothing. We tried several
> different configurations (Auto negotiate, fixed 100mb Full-Duplex, etc.),
> nothi
Phil Brutsche wrote:
> Yes, but it's specific to managed switches, and even then only if the
> switch supports MDIX.
>
> No managed switch? Sorry, not much you can do about it.
>
I wasn't referring to the switch. I was referring to the Soekris box.
The ethernet ports on the net5501 are Auto MDI
]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:40 PM
To: "Chuck (Doc) Beaudette"
Cc: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
Subject: Re: [Soekris] Compatibility Issue w/ Soekris 5501 and Cisco 2640
Switch
>
> When I replaced the 4801 with a new 5501, the throughput between the
> Cisco 2640 and
Yes, but it's specific to managed switches, and even then only if the
switch supports MDIX.
No managed switch? Sorry, not much you can do about it.
Chris Babcock wrote:
> I have also seen similar behavior with devices that do auto MDI<->MDIX
> setting with some devices. Unfortunately, I'm not s
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 02:44:34PM -0700, Chris Babcock wrote:
> I have also seen similar behavior with devices that do auto MDI<->MDIX
> setting with some devices. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if there is a
> way to control the MDI/MDIX function in software. Anybody, here know if
> there is a
jmc wrote:
> --- Chuck (Doc) Beaudette [Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 01:32:42PM -0700]: ---
>> I have noted what appears to be a compatibility issue between the new
>> Soekris and Cisco 2640 switch. I previously had a 4801 in my network
>> connected to a Cisco 2640 for customers on a local Fiber network.
>
> When I replaced the 4801 with a new 5501, the throughput between the Cisco
> 2640 and the Soekris router dropped to next to nothing. We tried several
> different configurations (Auto negotiate, fixed 100mb Full-Duplex, etc.),
> nothing seemed to make any difference. Finally, we put a Netgear s
--- Chuck (Doc) Beaudette [Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 01:32:42PM -0700]: ---
>
> I have noted what appears to be a compatibility issue between the new
> Soekris and Cisco 2640 switch. I previously had a 4801 in my network
> connected to a Cisco 2640 for customers on a local Fiber network. The 4801
> ac
I have noted what appears to be a compatibility issue between the new
Soekris and Cisco 2640 switch. I previously had a 4801 in my network
connected to a Cisco 2640 for customers on a local Fiber network. The 4801
acted as the router between the fiber switch and our Cisco border router.
Average 95
11 matches
Mail list logo
