Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Assertion failed

2008/3/29, Fabio Margarido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The attached patch fixes the behavior of --enable-ndebug. No thoughts > on the assertion? Thanks for the patch. Please note that configure is generated from configure.ac and assorted m4 files in m4 directory, which should be fixed instead of confi

[Sofia-sip-devel] sofia-sip changes (2008-04-01)

This posting was generated automatically from darcs repo . Tue Apr 1 13:49:10 EEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] * nua_stack.c: include Allow-Events in most messages initiating dialog The Allow-Events header is now included with NOTIFY, PUBLISH, REGISTER, an

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Allow-Events Header Not Appearing in Outbound Requests

>have had no success getting the "Allow-Events:" header to >appear in outbound SIP messages. I tried included the >SIPTAG_ALLOW_EVENTS_STR() tag >in the following API calls, and none have worked: >nua_set_params() >nua_handle() >nua_set_hparams() >nua_subscribe() Try using tag SIPTAG_ALLOW_EVEN

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Problems with bad contact address

>2008/4/1, Timo Bruhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> In my scenario a client (with sofialib) registers with to my application >> (nua-api, sofia 1.12.8) over tls.> >> Because of the already know problem the client does not write the used tcp >> port to >> the contact header, but the port specified wi

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Problems with bad contact address

2008/4/1, Timo Bruhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In my scenario a client (with sofialib) registers with to my application > (nua-api, sofia 1.12.8) over tls. > Because of the already know problem the client does not write the used tcp > port to > the contact header, but the port specified with NUTA

[Sofia-sip-devel] Problems with bad contact address

Hello all, at the moment I seem to have a problem similiar to that one described in a mail by Michael Jerris some months ago. >>[Sofia-sip-devel] bad contact adress. >> >>Michael Jerris >>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:48:25 -0700 >>We have a problem where we send an invite to a client behind nat, that i