2008/1/18, Bernhard Suttner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have another problem. I will use this thread because it is related to
it.
Following scenario:
1. A calls B but with SDP a=inactive
2. B answer to A with 200 OK with SDP a=inactive
3. Now the dialog exists.
4. A send then a INVITE to B
Hi,
I have another problem. I will use this thread because it is related to
it.
Following scenario:
1. A calls B but with SDP a=inactive
2. B answer to A with 200 OK with SDP a=inactive
3. Now the dialog exists.
4. A send then a INVITE to B without SDP
5. B answer to A with 200 OK with SDP
2008/1/16, Bernhard Suttner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think I could fix that bug but don't know how
(ok, I think the problem is in soa/soa_static.c function soa_sdp_mode_set).
Can somebody give me a hint how to fix that because I dont know what the
sm- and rm- in the
soa_sdp_mode_set function
Hi folks,
I have a question about a INVITE which has a SDP session description
with a a=inactive.
The problem is, that sofia sip then answers with a=recvonly which is
wrong according to:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3264.txt - Section 6.1
If an offered media
stream is listed as inactive, it
