Hi ,
Just to be sure that it is the same as SOFT-7399, could you send me a scene
file so that we can investigate it ?
Thanks
Ivan
Email : ivan@nospam.autodesk.com (please remove nospam from email
address)
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Kris Rivel wrote:
> Any idea why creating a symmetr
These days if you hit the right combination of drivers and planet alignment
they are OK.
Performance wise they have been ahead of nVIDIA for a while in number
crunching, the main problem is the drivers are still a coin toss chance,
and that OCL isn't anywhere as popular as CUDA.
With win7 or 8 an
This has happened to me before, it usually stems from old geometry that
somehow got corrupted. I usually export as OBJ and reimport and its fixed.
Some of our geo here was made 3 years ago in older versions of softimage,
have been passed back and forth between users and eventually just got nasty.
Hey Joey,
I have to say the one program that has hands down beaten every other app to
encode video is Adobe Media Encoder.
It's very straightforward to use, and all it does is convert and encode
video. It comes with a whole list of presets for every flavor of HD,
various devices, formats, broadca
Hi Joey I won’t comment too much about frame-rates, other than saying I’m lucky
we have 24p / 25p / 50i in Europe – North American frame rates are such a mess.
For resolution, 1920by1080 (=full HD) is really the defacto standard. It is
quite effective as a universal master format, covering prett
Most of the stuff we work with on the commercial side is 1920x1080 -
23.976fps because that is the resolution and frame rate most commercials
are shot with. On rare occasions we work in 29.97 and 1280x720. Youtube and
Vimeo support 1920x1080 these days so I just prefer to go full raster even
if the
hang on a minute... thats a bullet point... months of work, minimum!
On 20 March 2013 22:01, Byron Nash wrote:
> I think the point is that it would not take much effort at all for AD to
> add minimal export functions to export camera and nulls to AE. We don't
> need the kitchen sink, just a reli
I think the point is that it would not take much effort at all for AD to
add minimal export functions to export camera and nulls to AE. We don't
need the kitchen sink, just a reliable camera and some nulls.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Raffaele Fragapane <
raffsxsil...@googlemail.com> wrote:
jep, thanks for the suggestions..
i am gonna sleep over it and probably write my own . . .
Am 20.03.2013 um 14:52 schrieb Tim Crowson :
> Your best bet is probably to disable automatic backups in your Soft prefs and
> write your own back system instead. Unfortunately.
> -Tim
>
> On 3/20/2013 7
All good :)
Sven's changes solved the viewport and render problem. Thanks man.
Although thanks to you other guys :)
Cheers,
Duncan
On 20 March 2013 19:31, Sven Constable wrote:
> in the rendertree, open the image node. There you will find 'Image
> Filtering'…
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* softim
in the rendertree, open the image node. There you will find 'Image
Filtering'
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Duncan
Greenwood
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 17:32
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: pixe
open your render tree. select the image and in the ppg select the Texturing
tab.
under OpenGL Texturing settings up the maxium resolution.
does that fix it?
On 20 March 2013 16:32, Duncan Greenwood wrote:
> Sweet :)
> The 'scale textures up to nearest power of two' thing worked. I'm not
> sure
Sweet :)
The 'scale textures up to nearest power of two' thing worked. I'm not sure
where to find the elliptical filtering and bilinear interpolation settings
though.
On 20 March 2013 17:24, Vladimir Jankijevic wrote:
> oh, that's why it worked for me. I have this setting OFF.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
oh, that's why it worked for me. I have this setting OFF.
thanks
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Sven Constable wrote:
> For the viewport : Under preferences-->Display, turn on 'scale textures
> up to nearest power of two'
>
> ** **
>
> For rendering: turn on elliptical filtering and turn
forgot to add, you have to restart softimage to make the display change
work.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Sven Constable
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 16:15
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: pixel a
For the viewport : Under preferences-->Display, turn on 'scale textures up
to nearest power of two'
For rendering: turn on elliptical filtering and turn off bilinear
interpolation.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf O
I did do that. Yes. Taking filtering off removes the blur, but it still
only displays in the viewport at half resolution.
It's as if the setting 'uninterpolated pixel' is not actually
"uninterpolated". It's actually interpolating using "nearest neighbour"
instead of bilinear or cubic interpolat
Sorry...forgot about this thread! I'm using Soft 2013 SP1. Yes..I get
that error or something similar: ERROR : Invalid procedure call or
argument: 'CreateSymmetryMappingTemplate'
It points to a line of code. Using Gear to rebuild the envelope fixes the
problem. But it would be nice to have th
Have you even opened the clip properties and took a look what is inside? ->
http://download.autodesk.com/global/docs/softimage2013/en_us/userguide/files/property3509.htm#WS3ED399EEF2243144A8E6B3EEB78DEAF1-0044
you can set the minification and magnification to 'uninterpolated pixel'.
this should fi
Oh yeh. There is one workaround that I did find. If I save the textures
at double the resolution (256X256 instead of 128X128) then it looks ok in
the XSI viewport. I'd rather not have to do that though. It would be nice
if I can simply get XSI to display ALL the pixels...
On 20 March 2013 15:
Your best bet is probably to disable automatic backups in your Soft
prefs and write your own back system instead. Unfortunately.
-Tim
On 3/20/2013 7:34 AM, Ed Manning wrote:
Maybe you can create a symbolic link to the new backup folder location?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Sebastian Kowa
Thanks Stephen. I'm wanting to avoid having to use the Project Manager
altogether, and it looks like I should be able to have my script write
the prefs directly, since thankfully the prefs file isn't in a binary
format.
-Tim
On 3/19/2013 3:53 PM, Stephen Blair wrote:
And if that is not set...
...pinging
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Scott Lange
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 12:33 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: test
yeasting
Problem solved. There was some problem with my account. I talked to Peter
from Ballistic and he fixed my password.
Now watching! =)
2013/3/19 Raffaele Fragapane
> Thanks.
>
> As far as I know everything should be instantaneous. People who bought it
> already told me anywhere between right away
Maybe you can create a symbolic link to the new backup folder location?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Sebastian Kowalski wrote:
> awesome!
>
>
> Am 20.03.2013 um 11:42 schrieb Stephen Blair :
>
> > No
> > On 20/03/2013 6:31 AM, Sebastian Kowalski wrote:
> >> hey list,
> >>
> >> as I understa
Thanks Stephen. That's good to hear.
On 20 Mar 2013 10:49, "Stephen Blair" wrote:
> Yes.
> The service pack downloads are not behind the Subscription Center wall.
> The readme says they use the same license as the original release version
> (that is, 2013 SP1 uses the same license as 2013).
>
>
http://www.si-community.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=3526
latest one.
ati rigth now leaves nvidia in the dust
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Dan Yargici wrote:
> "Ati was tested over and over and showing a lot better viewport results in
> Softimage than nvidia... "
>
> Really? I don'
"Ati was tested over and over and showing a lot better viewport results in
Softimage than nvidia... "
Really? I don't remember anyone ever suggesting ATI was anything other
than shit!
DAN
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Mirko Jankovic
wrote:
> testing it a bit and looks great!
> amazing wor
Yes.
The service pack downloads are not behind the Subscription Center wall.
The readme says they use the same license as the original release
version (that is, 2013 SP1 uses the same license as 2013).
On 20/03/2013 6:37 AM, ste dalton wrote:
Apologies for the dullness of this question, but i
awesome!
Am 20.03.2013 um 11:42 schrieb Stephen Blair :
> No
> On 20/03/2013 6:31 AM, Sebastian Kowalski wrote:
>> hey list,
>>
>> as I understand every file structure is valid, as long as softimage finds
>> the dsprojectinfo file.
>> so far so good, problem now is, that I need to move the bac
No
On 20/03/2013 6:31 AM, Sebastian Kowalski wrote:
hey list,
as I understand every file structure is valid, as long as softimage finds the
dsprojectinfo file.
so far so good, problem now is, that I need to move the backup directory some
place else.
is this posssible? cause there is no chance
Apologies for the dullness of this question, but i if don't take out a
subscription for softimage can i still install and run service pack as and
when they are released?
I've tried google but the answers aren't massively clear.
i'd presume i can as service backs are just bug fixes for rushed to m
testing it a bit and looks great!
amazing work guys, grats.
any ETA for production ready version?
also reall shame again that it is nvidia only for now. Ati was tested over
and over and showing a lot better viewport results in Softimage than
nvidia... having this support openCL would be great!
Bu
hey list,
as I understand every file structure is valid, as long as softimage finds the
dsprojectinfo file.
so far so good, problem now is, that I need to move the backup directory some
place else.
is this posssible? cause there is no chance at all to switch that in the
preferences..
-sebasti
34 matches
Mail list logo
