There are a lot of blind people here. AD sucks.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Guy Rabiller
wrote:
>
> All until Autodesk came.
>
> Here is what happened in 2008:
>
> http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/item?siteID=123112=12030177=14271589
>
> Then when Ronald
All until Autodesk came.
Here is what happened in 2008:
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/item?siteID=123112=12030177=14271589
Then when Ronald Beirouti left (who created ICE), it was definitely the
end of ICE (and Softimage).
** The 2003-2012 list was XSIBase job post count.
On 04/20/16 20:45, Jason S wrote:
On 04/20/16 7:27, Matt Lind wrote:
The couple of versions of extra
On 04/20/16 7:27, Matt Lind wrote:
The couple of versions of extra dev was just the benefit of having the larger
staff for a short period of time.
You can look at Softimage's market share any way you like, but it all comes
back to
a better video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZu-zjtd6PQ
On 20 April 2016 at 01:59, Francois Lord wrote:
> Ok I just watched the video and I must admit this is pretty cool!
> Expressions for collection members, relative overrides with multiplier
> and offset, overrides
"We use Shotgun here and the general perception is that the development
pace has appeared to slow since the acquisition. There has been updates and
some nice stuff, but at the same time larger chunks that seem to be still
pending."
This has been our observation as well... some basic things like
Welcome back, Stephen.
gray
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Blair
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 10:07 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Autodesk acquires Solid Angle
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016
Same here.
Glad you were part of the acquisition.
You help has always been invaluable and incredibly appreciated.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Angus Davidson
wrote:
> Good to hear ;) Hope it continues to be awesome
>
>
> On 20 Apr 2016, at 4:07 PM, Stephen Blair
Good to hear ;) Hope it continues to be awesome
On 20 Apr 2016, at 4:07 PM, Stephen Blair
> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Rob Wuijster
> wrote:
Yes, I can imagine Stephen was jumping
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Rob Wuijster wrote:
> Yes, I can imagine Stephen was jumping with joy to be part of the AD
> family again... ;-)
>
Getting laid off by Autodesk was the best thing that ever happened to me ;)
Because I couldn't have planned a better career move.
Yes, I can imagine Stephen was jumping with joy to be part of the AD
family again... ;-)
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 20-4-2016 12:40, Srecko Micic wrote:
Interesting thing is that Stephen Blair is again at AD :D
--
*Micic Srecko*
---
*Mail:*
Just speculation on my part, but I think the hiring of the Singapore team
was made after the decision to send Softimage into maintenance mode. The
Montreal and Singapore teams co-existed as a means to get the Singapore team
up to speed with the nuances of the application as Softimage was built
>
> Interesting thing is that Stephen Blair is again at AD :D
>
> --
> *Micic Srecko*
>
ow my, I wonder how he feels.
--
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
Interesting thing is that Stephen Blair is again at AD :D
\--
**Micic Srecko**
\---
**Mail:** [srecko.mi...@gmail.com](mailto:srecko.mi...@gmail.com)
**Skype**: srecko.micic
\---
On Apr 20 2016, at 10:50 am, Graham Bell bell...@gmail.com wrote:
Correction: ADSK bought softimage for $35 million.
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:36:18 +0200, Tom Kleinenberg
wrote:
That drop in market share was largely down to AD's inability to market
it.
That was my perception as well, though I'd make that unwillingness,
rather than
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:36:18 +0200, Tom Kleinenberg
wrote:
That drop in market share was largely down to AD's inability to market
it.
That was my perception as well, though I'd make that unwillingness, rather
than inability.
Phasing out Softimage however was not so
Well, if you remember it was the same profile for Ice.
They had that supa-crew of ice developpers that gave us 2 or 3 generations
of true big ice improvements (crowd, ice modeling, Build array from set,
etc..)
Then there was that moment when they fired a big part of the crew, saying
that
I was hoping shotgun would have been may available to EDU Institutions post
acquisition , but sadly that wasn’t the case. I am more hopeful about Arnold.
From: Graham Bell [mailto:bell...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 April 2016 10:49 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re:
We use Shotgun here and the general perception is that the development pace
has appeared to slow since the acquisition. There has been updates and some
nice stuff, but at the same time larger chunks that seem to be still
pending.
>From a brand view AD might keep SA/Arnold separate in the same way
That drop in market share was largely down to AD's inability to market it.
They seemed to be positioning it as an "Almost Houdini but not quite"
because it had ICE. They couldn't sell it as an animation package, as that
would canibalize Maya market share, an asset creation package as that would
20 matches
Mail list logo