Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 1:50 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Multi-Layered .EXR - The revival...
Hi
>make no mention of "interleave options" or the like.
The "interleave option" is not what you are searching for.
It is the "multi-part" t
ical director
> The day has 24 hours, if that does not suffice, I will take the night
>
>
> --
> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [
> mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
> ] *On Behalf Of *Jason S
> *Sent:* Friday, August 28, 2015 8:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On
Behalf Of Jason S
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 8:04 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Multi-Layered .EXR - The revival...
_
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Jason S
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 8:04 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Multi-Layered .EXR - The revival...
Indeed so it seems!
and still looks very new because each re
Indeed so it seems!
and still looks very new because each renderer's output options
(at least in the docs) make no mention of "interleave options" or
the like.
So I wonder what are generally the defaults for Multichannel EXR
outputs. (
Yeah you're right. But just using exr 2.x isn't enough to ensure
multi-layered files are read fast. You have to save the exr in a specific
way.
>From Nukes help:
Notes on Rendering OpenEXR Files
Nuke supports multi-part OpenEXR 2.0.1 files, which allow you to store your
channels, layers, and vie
On 08/27/15 8:44, Jens Lindgren
wrote:
This slowness is solved with EXR 2.0 but Softimage isn't
using that.
Correction: MentalRay in SI may not be using
that,
but Arnold, Redshift, and 3Delight in SI do
Not many people use multilayer exr because it's slower to read than
splitting it out to different files.
This slowness is solved with EXR 2.0 but Softimage isn't using that.
Don't really know if it's possible with MR but in Arnold you simply name
the framebuffers the same and it gets merged to one
bump
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Pierre Schiller <
activemotionpictu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> bump.
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Pierre Schiller <
> activemotionpictu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi team. I know this has been posted a lot of times, but I was wondering
>> if AD did ever fi
bump.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Pierre Schiller <
activemotionpictu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi team. I know this has been posted a lot of times, but I was wondering
> if AD did ever fixed
> the issue with multilayered .exr images on a single file from MR? (mental
> ray).
>
> I know all othe
Hi team. I know this has been posted a lot of times, but I was wondering if
AD did ever fixed
the issue with multilayered .exr images on a single file from MR? (mental
ray).
I know all other render motors work normally when rendering layered .exr
images (arnold, vray, etc..)
But SI 2015 can alread
11 matches
Mail list logo
