[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=comments#action_12458052 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-81:
--
Something like this, then?
Plus:
I'd probably also want to give th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-81?page=comments#action_12458072 ]
Ogün Bilge commented on SOLR-81:
Yes exactly as you described.
The Fieldnames for the gram fields have to be like this to make it work with
SpellChecker:
I've been patching https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-59
for backward compatibility, and also decided to normalize the name of
the first result set.
The standard request handler used a name of null, resulting in
The JSON/Ruby/Python handler needed a name, and so if the name was
null, d
Otis, i finally got a chance to try this out, and I'm noticing that while
most of hte pages look great, the analysis page isn't displaying the form
by default, so if you load
"http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/analysis.jsp"; or click the link from the
main admin page:
"http://localhost:8983/solr/ad
: The standard request handler used a name of null, resulting in
:
:
i think that was a cut/paste error, you mean...
...right?
: The JSON/Ruby/Python handler needed a name, and so if the name was
: null, defaulted to "response", resulting in
:
: "response":{"numFound":0,"start":0,"docs":[
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-70?page=all ]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-70.
--
Resolution: Fixed
commited variation of patch which worked against trunk (with newer XML based
pages)
> ping.jsp is very naive -- doesn't work with "qt" or any extra query a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-58?page=all ]
Hoss Man reopened SOLR-58:
--
analysis.jsp currently isn't working properly ... it doesn't display the form
by default, and if you manually create a URl that should work, you get a
malformed XM
Good catch. IMO, this should be fixed before we cut our release.
-Yonik
On 12/13/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Otis, i finally got a chance to try this out, and I'm noticing that while
most of hte pages look great, the analysis page isn't displaying the form
by default, so if
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-78?page=all ]
Hoss Man reassigned SOLR-78:
Assignee: Hoss Man
I tried to produce an example of the type of thing i'm worried about with the
body of a comment getting slurped up ... but i could not -- as far as i c
: Some of the things I think could go in:
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-79
... i don't think that's quite ready yet.
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-78
...i'll try to have that ready tomorow
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-70
...done
Sounds like a plan... issues 58,59,78 left.
-Yonik
On 12/13/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Some of the things I think could go in:
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-79
... i don't think that's quite ready yet.
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-78
specify default values in the schema
Key: SOLR-82
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-82
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: update
Reporter: Ryan McKinley
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-82?page=all ]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-82:
--
Attachment: defaultValuesPatch.patch
This modifies SchemaField.java to keep a "defaultValue" and
DocumentBuilder.java makes sure they exist when returning the documen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-59?page=all ]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-59:
-
Attachment: SOLR-59-20061213.patch
Ok, updated patch to
- bump current & default version to 2.2
- bump version used in tests to 2.2 (added 2.0 to tests where neces
Some incubator people have been recommending release notes.
It made me think about the discussion we had about calling out non
back compatible stuff in CHANGES.txt, and makes me think that should
be the release notes.
Put a higher level section at the top, with potentially a little more
general in
If people really want a separate RELEASE_NOTES.txt, we could copy some
of this stuff out I suppose. I'm not sure if it's needed at this
point though.
I also figured out that things like CHANGES/RELEASE_NOTES don't need
the ASL too (no one else has it, and arat didn't complain either).
-Yonik
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-82?page=comments#action_12458380 ]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-82:
--
only had a chance to skim the patch so far, and i think this aspect from the
mailing list is going to be a real issue with indexing perfo
17 matches
Mail list logo
