Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of HowToContribute by BertrandDelacretaz

On 4/30/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...eh? ... the https port is open to everyone as well correct?.. Yes you're right, sorry about that. I have corrected http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute, but left http instead of https in the svn co example. I think we usually

RE: The ability to offering offset of keyword in search result

Would you please give me an example? For example, I want to pick only fieldname=features from the query result Regards, David -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 1:50 AM To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: The

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-20) A simple Java client for updating and searching

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492902 ] Will Johnson commented on SOLR-20: -- the new api's work great, thanks! what's the plan for this going forward? id'

Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of HowToContribute by BertrandDelacretaz

: advertise http over https for read-only access, as it causes less load : on our servers, and possibly less firewall problems. M ... gotcha, that makes sense. -Hoss

Re: svn commit: r533978 - /lucene/solr/trunk/src/webapp/src/org/apache/solr/servlet/SolrDispatchFilter.java

Ryan: this should probably be called out in the CHANGES.txt as a change in behavior. : Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 09:02:08 - : From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org : To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: svn commit: r533978 - :

Re: javadoc location?

found the problem in DirectSolrConnection.java, we were tickling this bug... http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5082928 ...my gut says not to try and manually fix the site right now, and just wait for the next nightly to take care of it -- mainly because i'm paranoid about

RE: The ability to offering offset of keyword in search result

It works! By the way, fl=field1+field2+ also works :-) -Original Message- From: Mike Klaas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 1:40 AM To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: The ability to offering offset of keyword in search result On 5/1/07, David Xiao

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492947 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-199: --- NGramTokenizerFactory is refering to constants from, and constructing an instance of,

Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-199) N-gram

: NGramTokenizerFactory is refering to constants from, and constructing : an instance of, EdgeNGramTokenizer : Are you saying that this worries you b/c it is referenced in the example : schema and will thus break without the lucene-analyzers package? I do : agree that this example should

Re: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-199) N-gram

Good point. That looks flat out broken. -- Adam On May 1, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : NGramTokenizerFactory is refering to constants from, and constructing : an instance of, EdgeNGramTokenizer : Are you saying that this worries you b/c it is referenced in the example

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-199) N-gram

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Hiatt updated SOLR-199: Attachment: SOLR-199-n-gram.patch This is the new patch, not just cut out of SOLR-81... I removed

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-115) replace BooleanQuery.getClauses() with clauses()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated SOLR-115: -- Attachment: SOLR-115.patch audited all of our uses of getClausese() ... they were mainly for iteration, and a

[jira] Assigned: (SOLR-115) replace BooleanQuery.getClauses() with clauses()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man reassigned SOLR-115: - Assignee: Hoss Man replace BooleanQuery.getClauses() with clauses()

[jira] Created: (SOLR-223) SolrQueryParser should do more error checking

SolrQueryParser should do more error checking - Key: SOLR-223 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-223 Project: Solr Issue Type: Improvement Components: search

[jira] Assigned: (SOLR-217) schema option to ignore unused fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man reassigned SOLR-217: - Assignee: Hoss Man schema option to ignore unused fields -

[jira] Updated: (SOLR-217) schema option to ignore unused fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated SOLR-217: -- Attachment: ignoreUnnamedFields_v3.patch added a simple test to the existing patch. one thing to note is that

[jira] Commented: (SOLR-20) A simple Java client for updating and searching

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493006 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-20: --- great! Any feedback/help would be wonderful. I hope it is not *too* long