[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510574
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
> I don't see any code allowing initialization of the transform chain, or
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-269:
---
Attachment: SOLR-269-UpdateRequestProcessorFactory.patch
* loads UpdateRequestProcessorFactories using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510563
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
> perhaps the extra functionality of transformations and updating should be
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-287:
---
Summary: set commitMaxTime when adding a document (was: set commitMaxTime
when adding a single documen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510551
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-287:
---
why is this linked to a "single document"? Or do you mean a single add command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510550
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-267:
---
The double logging issue with the new update handler framework should be fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510538
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
> with update processors, the needed interface to add a document changes... you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510518
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
> This all works nicely with a simple 'transform' chain.
I don't see any code
Is line 189 of LICENSE.txt supposed to say something other then:
Copyright [] [name of copyright owner]
?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510513
]
Jeff Rodenburg commented on SOLR-290:
-
Fix applied in revision #141 @ http://solrstuff.org/svn/solrsharp.
> Boost
Boost property in QueryParameter class not a Float
--
Key: SOLR-290
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-290
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: clients - C#
Affe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510510
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
> Some other issues how to configure processors for multiple update
> ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510506
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
> - conditional copyField, field transformations (between multiple fields
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510504
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
Some other issues how to configure processors for multiple update handlers?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510487
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
> What do you see as the common use case for wanting to chain request
> process
Looking back at SOLR-183 I see JJ had a comment about this...
One open question is getFieldParam: Should the semantics of
required.getFieldParam("facet.limit", "abc") be to fail if the
parameter is not supplied for the field (e.g. f.abc.facet.limit), or
not supplied for either the field or as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510484
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-269:
I like the AddUpdateCommand changes
What do you see as the common use case fo
i've run into a weird little oddity while working on SOLR-258 ... the
start/end/gap params need to be required, but i want it to be possible to
use "generaic"values for them even while vaceting over multiple fields,
ie this should work and use the start/end/gap values for both the birth
and death
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510482
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-289:
the "added id={VA902B} in 0ms" is now priinted out in UpdateRequestProcessor -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510479
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
> couldn't that just be a DelegateUpdateRequestProcessor that is constructed
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-139:
--
Attachment: (was: UpdateProcessor.patch)
> Support updateable/modifiable documents
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-139:
--
Comment: was deleted
> Support updateable/modifiable documents
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-269:
--
Attachment: UpdateProcessor.patch
OK, this patch adds the ability to specify multiple processor factories
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated SOLR-139:
--
Attachment: UpdateProcessor.patch
OK, this patch adds the ability to specify multiple processor factories
Double logging from update handler framework
Key: SOLR-289
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-289
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Yonik Seeley
Priority
FWIW,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CodeOfConduct (totally unofficial)
discourages them as well, but leaves it up to the PMC... And I
recall seeing a Nutch or Hadoop email wanting to remove them as well.
On Jul 4, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Bill Au wrote:
+1
Bill
On 7/2/07, Ian Holsman <[E
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-60?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-60:
--
Attachment: SOLR-60-Overwrite.patch
This changes AddUpdateCommand to want 'update' and depricates the othe
FYI, I'm working up a prototype right now to handle multiple request processors.
excellent.
check: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139
to see how I was thinking about supporting multiple processors.
Essentially a single parent processor that may loop through
'transformers' or wh
On 5-Jul-07, at 10:44 AM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 7/5/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I get a chance I'll take a look to see what the problem is,
but I
> haven't touched this section of the code in quite a while.
>
I'm looking at it now... I'll at l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510429
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-269:
---
couldn't that just be a DelegateUpdateRequestProcessor that is constructed
using a list
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12510425
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-269:
---
FYI, I'm working up a prototype right now to handle multiple request processors.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 7/5/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I get a chance I'll take a look to see what the problem is, but I
> haven't touched this section of the code in quite a while.
>
I'm looking at it now... I'll at least add a test that fails for the
Stax version and
Allow custom IndexSearcher class
Key: SOLR-288
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-288
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: search
Affects Versions: 1.2
Environ
On 7/5/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I get a chance I'll take a look to see what the problem is, but I
> haven't touched this section of the code in quite a while.
>
I'm looking at it now... I'll at least add a test that fails for the
Stax version and passes Xpp.
You pro
If I get a chance I'll take a look to see what the problem is, but I
haven't touched this section of the code in quite a while.
I'm looking at it now... I'll at least add a test that fails for the
Stax version and passes Xpp.
ryan
See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Solr-Nightly/133/changes
36 matches
Mail list logo
