See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1016/changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795063#action_12795063
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-236:
--
bq. I'm curious as to whether anyone has just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795067#action_12795067
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on SOLR-236:
Hi Grant,
{quote}
I would note, in looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795069#action_12795069
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
Unlike PointType, it seems odd that a user would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795070#action_12795070
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1586:
---
bq. Unlike PointType, it seems odd that a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795073#action_12795073
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. I'm not sure I see how to use a tile for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795075#action_12795075
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1586:
---
A tile is not a point. A tile is a box
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795073#action_12795073
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-1586 at 12/29/09 4:05 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795076#action_12795076
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. A tile is not a point.
Then we're talking past
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795077#action_12795077
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1586:
---
{quote}
A tile can also be viewed as an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795081#action_12795081
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-1586:
--
Hi,
I'm not entirely clear of the outcome of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795087#action_12795087
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1586:
---
Yep, the user still simply adds a Point to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795097#action_12795097
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-1586:
--
The alternatives I'm alluding to are the use of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795108#action_12795108
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1586:
---
Do you mean TrieFields (not familiar w/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795112#action_12795112
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-1586:
--
Ah yes sorry TrieFields. I don't see searching 2
Hmm, so it's faster to do 2 range searches than use the TermEnumerator to
find maybe 4-6 individual CartesianTier id's?
I had similar approaches in the past like 2 years ago, that just weren't
fast enough, and I've even published comparisons with Trie data types, and
find CartesianTier id's
Hi,
I had never done any experiments comparing them, that was what I was hoping
was going to be explored more and it seems you have done that. Do you have
more statistics by chance? Does the difference (which is pretty dramatic)
stay a constant ratio as you change the density and/or distances?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795116#action_12795116
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1586:
---
bq. I don't see searching 2 fields as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795118#action_12795118
]
Kay Kay commented on SOLR-1212:
---
Keeping this out of the codebase would result in the patch
Afraid I just took a sample set of data that was available to me at my last
job, and ran the test.
It kind of matched my expectations in terms of locallucene at the time, and
what Ure predicted for Trie.
To give you an idea of it's performance in production, the bounding box
retrieval for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795120#action_12795120
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-1586:
--
If its not something we want to support, then thats
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:41 PM, patrick o'leary pj...@pjaol.com wrote:
Afraid I just took a sample set of data that was available to me at my last
job, and ran the test.
It kind of matched my expectations in terms of locallucene at the time, and
what Ure predicted for Trie.
Do you still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795129#action_12795129
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. My original point was that this aspect of the
Do you still think there would be such a drastic difference in a lower
density situation?
I think if you bench mark it there will be cross over. It would be difficult
to measure at low ms ranges though.
If I were a betting person, I think it would be low.
Yeah I have looked into hilbert
On Dec 29, 2009, at 3:24 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
Threaded distance calculations get you into a pickle with the solr leaf
index readers,
On a side note, I think the thing to think about here is if there is a way to
do threaded function calculations, not just distance calculations.
On Dec 29, 2009, at 3:24 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
I'm also going to include tools to visualize this stuff on a map, that's
been one of the things that's slowed me down a lot in the past, it was hard
to verify what I was doing
but recent google map contributions and it's community have made
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795160#action_12795160
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1586:
---
Sounds good. I'm open to specific
I did a simple KML converter, and used some JS from http://maps.forum.nu/
and geoxml.js by Lance Dyas, and had a version up in running very quickly on
google maps.
with nothing more than
geoxml = new GeoXml(geoXML, map,url,{});
geoxml.parse();
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Grant Ingersoll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12795164#action_12795164
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1586:
bq. Sounds good. I'm open to specific suggestions
On Dec 29, 2009, at 4:34 PM, patrick o'leary wrote:
I did a simple KML converter, and used some JS from http://maps.forum.nu/
and geoxml.js by Lance Dyas, and had a version up in running very quickly on
google maps.
with nothing more than
geoxml = new GeoXml(geoXML, map,url,{});
30 matches
Mail list logo
